Publication | Closed Access
Perspectives on the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) 2004–2005
42
Citations
0
References
2014
Year
Forensic AccountingContinuous AuditingAccounting PracticeLawAuditingSecurities LawInternational AccountingAudit QualityPcaob DecisionFinancial AccountingPcaob StaffAudit Market StructureAccountingU.s. SecuritiesPublic Sector AccountingCorporate GovernanceAudit OversightFinanceAccounting PolicyBusinessPublic Company Accounting Oversight BoardAudit RegulationAccounting AuditAccounting Rule
SYNOPSIS This commentary reflects my experiences with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) during the academic year 2000/2001 (Academic Fellow) and the two calendar years 2004–2005 (Deputy Chief Accountant [Professional Practice]). These comments reflect only my thoughts without citations in support of or contrary to those thoughts and resulting opinions. The topics covered in this commentary include: (1) early staff relations between the PCAOB and SEC in their respective roles of audit standard setter and oversight agency; (2) the PCAOB decision to act as the sole audit standard setter for registered public companies displacing the AICPA in this role; (3) the PCAOB's approach to “revising” the interim audit standards through Rule 3101, Certain Terms Used in Auditing and Related Professional Practice Standards; (4) Audit Standard 3 (AS3), Audit Documentation; and (5) Audit Standard 2 (AS2), An Audit of Internal Control over Financial Reporting Performed in Conjunction With an Audit of Financial Statements. I will also comment on several observations made by others concerning the competence of PCAOB staff and the PCAOB Board members to set audit standards and perform meaningful inspections. I conclude with a brief note on the international aspects of PCAOB actions during this period.