Journal of the American Ceramic Society · 1997 · 36 citations · 18 references
Natural SciencesMaterials EngineeringMaterials ScienceCeramic MaterialsCeramicsMaterials CharacterizationCeramic CompositesCeramic Matrix CompositesComposite MaterialsMicrostructure AnalysisMicrostructure ControlNanocompositesAmorphous Phase ContentHot Pressing Of Ceramic CompositesMicrocrackingPhase BoundariesThermal ExpansionThermal Expansion MismatchThermal MismatchVolume Fraction Effects
Details of the fabrication and microstructures of hot‐pressed MoSi 2 reinforced–Si 3 N 4 matrix composites were investigated as a function of MoSi 2 phase size and volume fraction, and amount of MgO densification aid. No reactions were observed between MoSi 2 and Si 3 N 4 at the fabrication temperature of 1750°C. Composite microstructures varied from particle–matrix to cermet morphologies with increasing MoSi 2 phase content. The MgO densification aid was present only in the Si 3 N 4 phase. An amorphous glassy phase was observed at the MoSi 2 –Si 3 N 4 phase boundaries, the extent of which decreased with decreased MgO level. No general microcracking was observed in the MoSi 2 –Si 3 N 4 composites, despite the presence of a substantial thermal expansion mismatch between the MoSi 2 and Si 3 N 4 phases. The critical MoSi 2 particle diameter for microcracking was calculated to be 3 μm. MoSi 2 particles as large as 20 μm resulted in no composite microcracking; this indicated that significant stress relief occurred in these composites, probably because of plastic deformation of the MoSi 2 phase.
18