scAAV9 Intracisternal Delivery Results in Efficient Gene Transfer to the Central Nervous System of a Feline Model of Motor Neuron Disease

Thomas Bücher, Marie‐Anne Colle, Erin Wakeling, Laurence Dubreil, John C. Fyfe, Delphine Briot-Nivard, Maud Maquigneau, Sylvie Raoul, Yan Chérel, Stéphanie Astord,

Human Gene Therapy · 2013 · 42 citations · 47 references

Concepts

Abstract

On the basis of previous studies suggesting that vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) could protect motor neurons from degeneration, adeno-associated virus vectors (serotypes 1 and 9) encoding VEGF (AAV.vegf) were administered in a limb-expression 1 (LIX1)-deficient cat—a large animal model of lower motor neuron disease—using three different delivery routes to the central nervous system. AAV.vegf vectors were injected into the motor cortex via intracerebral administration, into the cisterna magna, or intravenously in young adult cats. Intracerebral injections resulted in detectable transgene DNA and transcripts throughout the spinal cord, confirming anterograde transport of AAV via the corticospinal pathway. However, such strategy led to low levels of VEGF expression in the spinal cord. Similar AAV doses injected intravenously resulted also in poor spinal cord transduction. In contrast, intracisternal delivery of AAV exhibited long-term transduction and high levels of VEGF expression in the entire spinal cord, yet with no detectable therapeutic clinical benefit in LIX1-deficient animals. Altogether, we demonstrate (i) that intracisternal delivery is an effective AAV delivery route resulting in high transduction of the entire spinal cord, associated with little to no off-target gene expression, and (ii) that in a LIX1-deficient cat model, however, VEGF expressed at high levels in the spinal cord has no beneficial impact on the disease course. Bucher and colleagues demonstrate that intracisternal delivery of self-complementary AAV9 (scAAV9)-encoding VEGF results in highly robust levels of VEGF protein in the spinal cord of cats. Yet, this approach has no beneficial impact on the disease course of a feline model of lower motor neuron disease.

References

47