Publication | Closed Access
So who won?
182
Citations
29
References
2012
Year
Unknown Venue
Artificial IntelligenceEngineeringCrowdsourcing Db SystemComputational Social ChoiceCrowdsourcing Database SystemComputational Social ScienceInformation RetrievalData ScienceData MiningCombinatorial OptimizationHuman ComputationData ManagementMechanism DesignEducational EntertainmentKnowledge DiscoveryComputer ScienceCrowdsourcingQuery OptimizationCrowd ComputingDb SystemAutomated ReasoningBusiness
We consider a crowdsourcing database system that may cleanse, populate, or filter its data by using human workers. Just like a conventional DB system, such a crowdsourcing DB system requires data manipulation functions such as select, aggregate, maximum, average, and so on, except that now it must rely on human operators (that for example compare two objects) with very different latency, cost and accuracy characteristics. In this paper, we focus on one such function, maximum, that finds the highest ranked object or tuple in a set. In particularm we study two problems: given a set of votes (pairwise comparisons among objects), how do we select the maximum? And how do we improve our estimate by requesting additional votes? We show that in a crowdsourcing DB system, the optimal solution to both problems is NP-Hard. We then provide heuristic functions to select the maximum given evidence, and to select additional votes. We experimentally evaluate our functions to highlight their strengths and weaknesses.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1