Vertical phasing as a corporate real estate strategy and development option

Anthony C. Guma, Jason R Pearson, Kate S Wittels, Richard de Neufville, David Geltner

Journal of Corporate Real Estate · 2009 · 37 citations · 2 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

Vertical expansion of occupied buildings is complex but feasible when planned from the outset, yet it has been underappreciated as a flexible development option in risky real‑estate markets. The study demonstrates that adding five or more stories to an existing building can serve as a valuable real option for corporate real‑estate strategy. The authors analyze four North American projects—Health Care Service Corp., Citicorp Campus, Bentall Five, and Tufts Dental Medicine—to illustrate vertical phasing. Vertical expansion offers organizational and logistical benefits, reasonable financial upside, and the flexibility to scale back, proving technically feasible and highlighting its value to developers.

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate the potential value of significant vertical phasing – that is, the addition of five or more stories to an existing building – as a valuable real option in real estate development, in particular for corporate real estate strategy. Design/methodology/approach The demonstration is done through in‐depth case studies of four major projects in North America: the 24 story, 880,000 square feet expansion of the Health Care Service Corporation building in Chicago; the Court Square Citicorp Campus in New York City; the Bentall Five project in Vancouver; and the Tufts University School of Dental Medicine building in Boston. Findings Vertical expansion appears to have significant organizational and logistical advantages for corporate developers, such as the ability to keep staff in one building, and the elimination of the need to relocate with its resulting inconvenience and potential to lose employees. Further, the financial analysis indicates that the option to expand vertically is a reasonable way for corporate developers to access convenient expansion space, while limiting their downside risk. Commercial developers on the other hand may find that the ability to scale back designs in the case of market downturns is particularly valuable. The case studies also confirm by example that the vertical expansion of buildings is technically possible. Although the process of erecting a major new building on top of a fully occupied building is clearly complex, it is not extraordinary difficult so long as the possibility of vertical expansion is built into the original design. Originality/value Vertical expansion of buildings has not been appreciated as an attractive feasible option for flexible development of real estate in a risky environment. These case studies and analysis bring this possibility to the attention of the real estate industry and corporate real estate managers.

References

2