Publication | Closed Access
Lessons from community-based payment for ecosystem service schemes: from forests to rangelands
85
Citations
85
References
2012
Year
Community-based ConservationEngineeringCommunity ControlLand UseAgricultural EconomicsSustainable DevelopmentEnvironmental PlanningForest GovernanceForest LivelihoodCommunity ForestrySocial SciencesEnvironmental PolicyEcosystem ManagementGeographyEcosystem Service SchemesClimate Finance InvestmentsCommunity-based PaymentDeforestationNatural Resource ManagementForest ProjectsEcosystem Services
Climate finance investments and international policy are driving new community-based projects incorporating payments for ecosystem services (PES) to simultaneously store carbon and generate livelihood benefits. Most community-based PES (CB-PES) research focuses on forest areas. Rangelands, which store globally significant quantities of carbon and support many of the world's poor, have seen little CB-PES research attention, despite benefitting from several decades of community-based natural resource management (CBNRM) projects. Lessons from CBNRM suggest institutional considerations are vital in underpinning the design and implementation of successful community projects. This study uses documentary analysis to explore the institutional characteristics of three African community-based forest projects that seek to deliver carbon-storage and poverty-reduction benefits. Strong existing local institutions, clear land tenure, community control over land management decision-making and up-front, flexible payment schemes are found to be vital. Additionally, we undertake a global review of rangeland CBNRM literature and identify that alongside the lessons learned from forest projects, rangeland CB-PES project design requires specific consideration of project boundaries, benefit distribution, capacity building for community monitoring of carbon storage together with awareness-raising using decision-support tools to display the benefits of carbon-friendly land management. We highlight that institutional analyses must be undertaken alongside improved scientific studies of the carbon cycle to enable links to payment schemes, and for them to contribute to poverty alleviation in rangelands.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1