Annals of Surgery · 1992 · 1.2K citations · 32 references
Veterinary MedicineNutritionSurgeryNutritional Support In Critical CareParenteral Drug DeliverySepsisAbdominal TraumaComplications Of SepsisEnteral NutritionPostoperative SepsisSepsis ManagementSeptic ShockAbdominal Penetrating TraumaAbdominal Trauma SurgeryEnteral Feeding CareInjury Severity MeasurementInjury Severity ScoreIntra-abdominal AbscessParenteral FeedingTrauma Nutrition
The study randomized 98 abdominal trauma patients to enteral or parenteral feeding within 24 h to determine whether the route of nutrition affects septic complications. Patients were randomized to receive enteral or parenteral nutrition with comparable macronutrient content, and septic morbidity was defined as pneumonia, intra‑abdominal abscess, empyema, line sepsis, or fasciitis with wound dehiscence. Enteral feeding was associated with significantly fewer pneumonias, abscesses, line sepsis, and overall infections—particularly in patients with higher injury severity—and the authors recommend early enteral access during initial surgery.
To investigate the importance of route of nutrient administration on septic complications after blunt and penetrating trauma, 98 patients with an abdominal trauma index of at least 15 were randomized to either enteral or parenteral feeding within 24 hours of injury. Septic morbidity was defined as pneumonia, intra-abdominal abscess, empyema, line sepsis, or fasciitis with wound dehiscence. Patients were fed formulas with almost identical amounts of fat, carbohydrate, and protein. Two patients died early in the study. The enteral group sustained significantly fewer pneumonias (11.8% versus total parenteral nutrition 31.,%, p < 0.02), intra-abdominal abscess (1.9% versus total parenteral nutrition 13.3%, p < 0.04), and line sepsis (1.9% versus total parenteral nutrition 13.3%, p < 0.04), and sustained significantly fewer infections per patient (p < 0.03), as well as significantly fewer infections per infected patient (p < 0.05). Although there were no differences in infection rates in patients with injury severity score < 20 or abdominal trauma index < 24, there were significantly fewer infections in patients with an injury severity score > 20 (p < 0.002) and abdominal trauma index > 24 (p < 0.005). Enteral feeding produced significantly fewer infections in the penetrating group (p < 0.05) and barely missed the statistical significance in the blunt-injured patients (p = 0.08). In the subpopulation of patients requiring more than 20 units of blood, sustaining an abdominal trauma index > 40 or requiring reoperation within 72 hours, there were significantly fewer infections per patient (p = 0.03) and significantly fewer infections per infected patient (p < 0.01). There is a significantly lower incidence of septic morbidity in patients fed enterally after blunt and penetrating trauma, with most of the significant changes occurring in the more severely injured patients. The authors recommend that the surgeon obtain enteral access at the time of initial celiotomy to assure an opportunity for enteral delivery of nutrients, particularly in the most severely injured patients.
32
The gut: a central organ after surgical stress.
Douglas W. Wilmore, Richard J. Smith, Sarah O’Dwyer et al. · PubMed · 1988 · 597 citations
Medicine, Physiology, Surgery +14
Role of Oral Intake in Maintenance of Gut Mass and Disaccharide Activity
Gary M. Levine, Julius J. Deren, Ezra Steiger et al. · Gastroenterology · 1974 · 500 citations