Journal of applied corporate finance · 1997 · 48 citations · 1 references
BusinessInsuranceRisk ManagementFinancial EconomicsInsurance EconomicsReinsuranceCatastrophe ReinsuranceCatastrophe RiskInsurance CompaniesInsurance RiskLiquidity RiskReinsurance MarketsCatastrophe Bond RiskCatastrophe Insurance ContractsCatastrophe Risk FinancingDiversification Benefits In ReinsuranceHedging ContractsRisk HedgingSecuritization Of Catastrophe Risk
Natural catastrophes have risen, creating a shortage of reinsurance capacity in the U.S., but securitized insurance risk offers capital markets positive excess returns and diversification, enabling them to supply needed capacity. This article discusses how insurance derivatives, especially Chicago Board of Trade catastrophe options, could solve the capacity problem. The article demonstrates that insurers can use catastrophe options and catastrophe‑linked bonds as low‑cost risk‑management tools. Reviewing catastrophe contract performance shows promising growth and liquidity.
The number and severity of natural catastrophes has increased dramatically over the last decade. As a result, there is now a shortage of capacity in the property catastrophe insurance industry in the U.S. This article discusses how insurance derivatives, particularly the Chicago Board of Trade's catastrophe options contracts, represent a possible solution to this problem. These new financial instruments enable the capital markets to provide the insurance industry with the reinsurance capacity it needs. The capital markets are willing to perform this role because of the new asset class characteristics of securitized insurance risk: positive excess returns and diversification benefits. The article also demonstrates how insurance companies can use insurance derivatives such as catastrophe options and catastrophe‐linked bonds as effective, low‐cost risk management tools. In reviewing the performance of the catastrophe contracts to date, the authors report promising signs of growth and liquidity in these markets.
1