Journal of Risk & Insurance · 1992 · 66 citations · 6 references
BusinessFinanceInsuranceInsurance EconomicsInsurance FinanceReinsuranceInsurance CompaniesInsurance Contract DesignInsurance ContractsInsurance PolicyInsurance PricingInsurance RiskFutures Contract DesignFutures Contract HedgingFutures Market StructureFutures Price DiscoveryHedging With Futures ContractsPricing Of Stop-loss ReinsuranceStop-loss PricingTraditional Reinsurance
The Chicago Board of Trade proposes a market for insurance futures and options, where call options act as stop‑loss reinsurance and put options reflect discounted expected retained losses, but significant barriers threaten its success. The study aims to show that, once a credible experience record exists, insurers can use the futures and options market to estimate portfolio correlation and replace traditional stop‑loss reinsurance. The authors propose that insurers compute the correlation between their policy portfolio and the market portfolio and then trade futures and options to hedge risk. The authors find that an insurance futures market offers a low‑cost hedging tool, allows non‑licensed entities to share in market profits, and facilitates price discovery.
This article discusses the Chicago Board of Trade's proposal to establish a market for futures contracts (and options on futures) written on insurance business. A European call option on an insurance future is equivalent to a stop-loss reinsurance contract on the portfolio of insurance policies underlying the futures contract. Put options correspond to the discounted expected value of retained losses. After a credible experience record is developed, an insurer can determine the correlation of its own portfolio of policies with the market portfolio and use the futures options market as a partial substitute for traditional stop-loss reinsurance. The advantages of such a market are that it provides a tool for hedging business risk, it allows an entity to participate in the market portfolio's profitability without being a licensed insurer, it may have lower transactions costs than traditional reinsurance, and it provides a mechanism for price discovery. But, despite the advantages of an insurance futures market, there are serious barriers to its success, which are discussed briefly.
6
The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities
Fischer Black, Myron S. Scholes · Journal of Political Economy · 1973 · 29.4K citations
The pricing of commodity contracts
Fischer Black · Journal of Financial Economics · 1976 · 2.9K citations
Theory of Financial Decision Making.
Eduardo S. Schwartz, Jonathan E. Ingersoll · The Journal of Finance · 1988 · 1.9K citations
Asset Pricing Models and Insurance Ratemaking
J. David Cummins · Astin Bulletin · 1990 · 59 citations · Full text