Divergent Effects of ATP on the Binding of the DnaK and DnaJ Chaperones to Each Other, or to Their Various Native and Denatured Protein Substrates

Abstract

Using the native proteins λP, λO, σ32, and RepA, as well as permanently unfolded α-carboxymethylated lactalbumin, we show that DnaK and DnaJ molecular chaperones possess differential affinity toward these protein substrates. In this paper we present evidence that the DnaK protein binds not only to short hydrophobic peptides, which are in an extended conformation, but also efficiently recognizes large native proteins (RepA, λP). The best substrate for either the DnaK or DnaJ chaperone is the native P1 coded replication RepA protein. The native σ32 transcription factor binds more efficiently to DnaJ than to DnaK, whereas unfolded α-carboxymethylated lactalbumin or native λP binds more efficiently to DnaK than to the DnaJ molecular chaperone. The presence of nucleotides does not change the DnaJ affinity to any of the tested protein substrates. In the case of DnaK, the presence of ATP inhibits, while a nonhydrolyzable ATP analogues markedly stimulates the binding of DnaK to all of these various protein substrates. ADP has no effect on these reactions. In contrast to substrate protein binding, DnaK binds to the DnaJ chaperone protein in a radically different manner, namely ATP stimulates whereas a nonhydrolyzable ATP analogue inhibits the DnaK-DnaJ complex formation. Moreover, the DnaKc94 mutant protein lacking 94 amino acids from its C-terminal domain, which still possesses the ATPase activity and forms a transient complex with protein substrates, does not interact with DnaJ protein. We conclude that the DnaK-ADP form, derived from ATP hydrolysis, possesses low affinity to the protein substrates but can efficiently interact with DnaJ molecular chaperone. Using the native proteins λP, λO, σ32, and RepA, as well as permanently unfolded α-carboxymethylated lactalbumin, we show that DnaK and DnaJ molecular chaperones possess differential affinity toward these protein substrates. In this paper we present evidence that the DnaK protein binds not only to short hydrophobic peptides, which are in an extended conformation, but also efficiently recognizes large native proteins (RepA, λP). The best substrate for either the DnaK or DnaJ chaperone is the native P1 coded replication RepA protein. The native σ32 transcription factor binds more efficiently to DnaJ than to DnaK, whereas unfolded α-carboxymethylated lactalbumin or native λP binds more efficiently to DnaK than to the DnaJ molecular chaperone. The presence of nucleotides does not change the DnaJ affinity to any of the tested protein substrates. In the case of DnaK, the presence of ATP inhibits, while a nonhydrolyzable ATP analogues markedly stimulates the binding of DnaK to all of these various protein substrates. ADP has no effect on these reactions. In contrast to substrate protein binding, DnaK binds to the DnaJ chaperone protein in a radically different manner, namely ATP stimulates whereas a nonhydrolyzable ATP analogue inhibits the DnaK-DnaJ complex formation. Moreover, the DnaKc94 mutant protein lacking 94 amino acids from its C-terminal domain, which still possesses the ATPase activity and forms a transient complex with protein substrates, does not interact with DnaJ protein. We conclude that the DnaK-ADP form, derived from ATP hydrolysis, possesses low affinity to the protein substrates but can efficiently interact with DnaJ molecular chaperone.