Concepedia

Abstract

For three crop seasons (1995-1997), potatoes (Solanum tuberosum L.) were grown in the field to evaluate theuse of an automatically controlled subsurface drip (SDI) irrigation system with conventional semi-closed seepageirrigation (subirrigation). Both the SDI irrigation system and the automated irrigation control system performed well, andcrop yields produced exceeded the industry average each year. The field water table responded more quickly to irrigationwith SDI, and the water table was more accurately controlled at the desired level. Potato yields were statistically similarwith the two irrigation systems, although 36% less irrigation water was applied with SDI, despite water requirements forfiltration and flushing to prevent emitter plugging. The continuous injection of a commercially available irrigation linecleaner prevented the buried irrigation emitters from plugging throughout the crop season. Emitter flow rate reductionsoccurred whenever irrigation was interrupted for extended periods of time, but flow rates recovered within days of theresumption of regular irrigations and chemical water treatment. Energy required for irrigation pumping was about 70%higher with SDI, despite lower volume of water applied, because the operating pressure was much higher than withseepage irrigation. Estimated cost to convert an existing seepage system to SDI is $990/ha.