PLoS ONE · 2013 · 28 citations · 47 references
MedicineOrthopedic SurgeryRehabilitation MedicineAssistive TechnologyPhysical ActivityRehabilitationLower-limb ProstheticsMobility AssessmentProsthetic CareProsthetic DevicesProsthetic PrescriptionWearable Health TechnologiesAccelerometryActivity MonitoringActivity-level MatchingEveryday Activity PatternsMatchingProsthetic Device EvaluationProsthetic Device PrescriptionProsthetic Device Use
To be effective, a prescribed prosthetic device must match the functional requirements and capabilities of each patient. These capabilities are usually assessed by a clinician and reported by the Medicare K-level designation of mobility. However, it is not clear how the K-level designation objectively relates to the use of prostheses outside of a clinical environment. Here, we quantify participant activity using mobile phones and relate activity measured during real world activity to the assigned K-levels. We observe a correlation between K-level and the proportion of moderate to high activity over the course of a week. This relationship suggests that accelerometry-based technologies such as mobile phones can be used to evaluate real world activity for mobility assessment. Quantifying everyday activity promises to improve assessment of real world prosthesis use, leading to a better matching of prostheses to individuals and enabling better evaluations of future prosthetic devices.
47
Functional evaluation : Barthel index
F. I. Mahonery · Medical Entomology and Zoology · 1965 · 12.9K citations
The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)
Colleen A. McHorney, WARE JOHNE, RACZEK ANASTASIAE · Medical Care · 1993 · 6.7K citations
FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION: THE BARTHEL INDEX.
Florence Mahoney, DOROTHEA W. BARTHEL · PubMed · 1965 · 5.9K citations