Increasing Political Sophistication Through Public Deliberation

TLDR

Deliberative democratic theory suggests that group deliberation enhances citizens’ political sophistication. The study examined whether face‑to‑face deliberation changes the coherence, integration, differentiation, and detail of participants’ political beliefs. The authors measured changes in belief coherence, integration, differentiation, and detail with pre‑ and post‑discussion questionnaires across seven issues, then combined results via meta‑analysis. Participation in NIF discussions increased schematic integration and differentiation and lowered attitudinal uncertainty. Keywords include attitude change, deliberation, democracy, ideology, national issues forums, persuasion, political sophistication, schema, and small‑group communication.

Abstract

Abstract Deliberative democratic theory posits that group deliberation aids the development of citizens' political sophistication. To test this general claim, the authors studied the association between participation in face-to-face political deliberation and subsequent changes in the coherence, integration, differentiation, and detail of participants' political beliefs. The authors measured these dependent variables using questionnaires administered before and after participation in a deliberative activity-National Issues Forums (NIF) discussions of political issues. Seven different issues were studied, and the results of these separate studies were integrated through meta-analysis. Changes in preforum and postformum responses suggested that participation in the NIF discussions increased participants' schematic integration and differentiation and reduced their attitudinal uncertainty. Keywords: Attitude Change Deliberation Democracy Ideology National Issues Forums Opinionation Persuasion Political Sophistication Schema Small Group Communication