Automated Infant Hearing Screening Using the ABR

Abstract

No AccessAmerican Journal of AudiologyClinical Focus: Innovation1 Jul 1995Automated Infant Hearing Screening Using the ABRDevelopment and Validation Barbara S. Herrmann, PhD Aaron R. Thornton and Janet M. Joseph Barbara S. Herrmann Department of Audiology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, 243 Charles Street, Boston, MA 02114 Google Scholar , Aaron R. Thornton Department of Audiology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, 243 Charles Street, Boston, MA 02114 Google Scholar and Janet M. Joseph Department of Audiology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, 243 Charles Street, Boston, MA 02114 Google Scholar https://doi.org/10.1044/1059-0889.0402.06 SectionsAboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationTrack Citations ShareFacebookTwitterLinked In References Fria, T. J. (1985). Identification of congenital hearing loss with the auditory brainstem response.In J. T. Jacobson (Ed.), The auditory brainstem response (pp. 317–336). San Diego, CA: College-Hill Press. Google Scholar Goldstein, R., & Tait, C. (1971). Critique of neonatal hearing evaluation.Journal of Speech Hearing Disorders, 26, 3–18. Google Scholar Hall, J. W., Kileny, P. R., Ruth, R. A., & Kripal, J. P. (1987). Newborn auditory screening with ALGO-1 vs.conventional auditory brainstem response. Asha, 29, 120. Google Scholar Jacobson, J. T., Jacobson, C. A., & Spahr, R. C. (1990). Automated and conventional ABR screening techniques in high-risk infants.Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 1, 187–195. Google Scholar Joint committee on infant hearing screening: Supplementary statement. (1974). Asha, 16, 160. Google Scholar Joint committee on infant hearing screening: Position statement. (1982). Asha, 24, 1017. Google Scholar Joint committee on infant hearing screening: Position statement. (1990). American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Bulletin, 10, 15. Google Scholar Kileny, P. R. (1988) New insights on infant ABR hearing screening.Scandinavian Audiology, Suppl 30: 81–88. Google Scholar Mahoney, T. (1987). The ups and downs of high-risk hearing screening: The Utah statewide program.Seminars in Hearing, 8, 155. Google Scholar Mauk, G. W., White, K. R., Mortensen, L. B., & Behrens, T. R. (1991). The effectiveness of screening programs based on high-risk characteristics in early identification of hearing impairment.Ear and Hearing, 12(5), 312–319. Google Scholar Murray, A., Javel, E., & Watson, C. (1985). Prognostic validity of auditory brainstem evoked response screening in newborn infants.American Journal of Otolaryngology, 6, 120–131. Google Scholar NIH Consensus Statement. (March 1–3, 1993). Early identification of hearing impairment in infants and young children. , 1–24. Google Scholar Peters, J. G. (1986) An automated infant screener using advanced evoked response technology.Hearing Journal, 39, 25–30. Google Scholar Schwartz, M., & Shaw, L. (1975). Signal processing: Discrete spectral analysis, detection and estimation. New York: McGraw Hill. Google Scholar Snedecor, G. W., & Cochran, W. G. (1967). Statistical methods (6th ed.). Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press. Google Scholar SpragueB. H., & ThorntonA. R. (1979). Simplified infant screening using middle component auditory evoked responses.Asha (A), 21, 735. Google Scholar Stein, L., Clark, S., & Kraus, N. (1983). The hearing-impaired infant: Patterns of identification and habilitation.Ear and Hearing, 4, 232–236. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar ThorntonA. R. (1978). Improved detection of auditory evoked potentials.Asha (A), 20, 765. Google Scholar Thornton, A. R. (1984) Technical consideration in recording the ABR.In A. Starr, C. Rosenberg, M. Don, & H. Davis (Eds.), Sensory evoked potentials 1. An international conference on standards for auditory brainstem response (ABR) testing. Milan: Centro Ricerche e Studi Amplifon, 183–184. Google Scholar ThorntonA. R. (1991) Detection algorithm for hearing sensitivity screening.IERASG XII Biennial symposium (A), 36, 18. Google Scholar Thornton, A. R., & Obenour, J. L. (1981). Auditory response detection method and apparatus.United States patents #4,275,744, 1981. Reviewed in Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 70, 1814. Google Scholar Turner, R. G. (1992). Modeling the cost and performance of early identification protocols.Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 2, 195–205. Google Scholar U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (1990). Healthy people 2000: National health promotion and disease prevention objectives. Washington, DC: Public Health Service. Google Scholar Von Wedel, H., Schauseil-Zipf, U., & Doring, W. H. (1988) Horscreening bei Neugeborenen and Sauglingen.Laryng. Rhinol. Otol., 67, 307–311. Google Scholar Additional Resources FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited ByAmerican Journal of Audiology9:1 (9-29)1 Jun 2000Year 2000 Position StatementCherow EvelynAmerican Journal of Audiology9:2 (142-148)1 Dec 2000Outcome of Newborn Hearing Screening by ABR Compared With Four Different DPOAE Pass CriteriaSusan E. Barker, Marci M. Lesperance and Paul R. Kileny Volume 4Issue 2July 1995Pages: 6-14 Get Permissions Add to your Mendeley library HistoryReceived: Aug 18, 1993Accepted: Jul 20, 1994 Published in issue: Jul 1, 1995 Metrics Downloaded 141 times Topicsasha-topicsasha-article-typesKeywordsnewbornauditory brainstem response (ABR)infant hearing screeningCopyright & PermissionsCopyright © 1995 American Speech-Language-Hearing AssociationPDF DownloadLoading ...