Publication | Closed Access
Low-Power On-Chip Charge-Recycling DC-DC Conversion Circuit and System
13
Citations
8
References
2013
Year
EngineeringEnergy EfficiencyPower Optimization (Eda)Electric Power ConversionPower ElectronicsSystems EngineeringPower-aware DesignConventional CircuitCharge-recycling CircuitPower ManagementElectrical EngineeringEnergy HarvestingPower-aware ComputingComputer EngineeringEnergy StorageMicroelectronicsLow-power ElectronicsPower IcEnergy ManagementPower-efficient ComputingTank Capacitor
A charge-recycling circuit and system that reuses the energy between two or more stacked CPUs is proposed in order to double the life of a battery. In this architecture, CPUs are divided into upper and lower load groups, and electrical charges are shared among the stacked CPUs and a tank capacitor. Charges are temporarily stored in the tank capacitor and are then reused. To control divided loads, a high-speed and energy-efficient regulator is needed. Internal circuit voltage variation between the upper and lower modules is determined by seven low-drop-out (LDO) regulators, a voltage-boosting capacitor circuit, and the tank capacitor. As a result, stable voltage can be supplied to each CPU, even if the upper and lower loads are different or a battery is being used. The LDOs improve the margin of collection in the tank capacitor or task schedule operation, and power efficiency is raised even further. The circuit can be implemented on silicon without a large external control circuit and inductor such as a switching regulator. This circuit was applied to an in-vehicle lock-step system because the upper and lower loads and tasks are the same. Additionally, by using the proposed task scheduling to maximize efficiency, this circuit can be applied not only to lock-step systems but also to general systems. Test chips were fabricated using 90-nm standard CMOS technology. Although the maximum power efficiency of a conventional circuit with a simple LDO is 44.4%, efficiency of the proposed charge-recycling circuit turned out to be as high as 87.1% with the test chips.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1