American Journal of Clinical Oncology · 2010 · 18 citations · 25 references
PharmacyOncologyFunctional AssessmentHealth AssessmentPsychometricsHealth Status MeasurementHealth-related Quality Of LifeHealth-related Quality Of Life MeasurementQuality Of LifeQuality Of Life AssessmentRating Scale DevelopmentConstruct ValidityOutcome Assessment InstrumentsPsychometric PropertiesPsychometric ValidityQuestionnaire ReliabilityQuestionnaire ValidityRating Scale ConstructionTest-retest Reliability
OBJECTIVE: To develop a self-administered quality of life instrument for patients with liver cancer. METHODS: The programmed decision procedure, the theory and methodology in developing rating scale were used to establish the instrument. On the basis of the data from 105 liver cancer patients, the psychometric properties of the scale were evaluated by indicators of validity, reliability coefficients, and statistical methods like structural equation modeling. RESULTS: The test-retest coefficients for physical, psychological, symptom/side effects, social domains, and the overall scale are 0.76, 0.86, 0.71, 0.80, and 0.84, respectively. The α coefficients for the above 4 domains are 0.78, 0.81, 0.75, and 0.68, respectively. The correlation analysis and the structural equation model showed good construct validity. The criterion-related was confirmed by using the functional living index-cancer simultaneously. The scale can reflect the changes of patients' quality of life after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The instrument is of good validity, reliability, and responsiveness and has been broadly used in China.
25
N.K. Aaronson, Sam H. Ahmedzai, Bengt Bergman et al. · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 1993 · 16K citations
The validation of visual analogue scales as ratio scale measures for chronic and experimental pain
Donald D. Price, Patricia McGrath, Amir Rafii et al. · Pain · 1983 · 3.9K citations
Nursing, Psychology, Pain Medicine +16