An Ecology for Cities: A Transformational Nexus of Design and Ecology to Advance Climate Change Resilience and Urban Sustainability

Daniel L. Childers, Mary L. Cadenasso, J. Morgan Grove, Victoria Marshall, Brian McGrath, Steward T. A. Pickett

Sustainability · 2015 · 271 citations · 51 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

Cities worldwide confront escalating challenges from rapid urbanization and climate change, undermining efforts toward sustainable futures. The authors argue that transformative solutions must begin at the design stage, proposing a design‑ecology nexus that redefines urban development processes and outcomes. They introduce a knowledge‑to‑action model that integrates design, infrastructure, and urban ecology, outlining its framework and validating it through multiple case studies.

Abstract

Cities around the world are facing an ever-increasing variety of challenges that seem to make more sustainable urban futures elusive. Many of these challenges are being driven by, and exacerbated by, increases in urban populations and climate change. Novel solutions are needed today if our cities are to have any hope of more sustainable and resilient futures. Because most of the environmental impacts of any project are manifest at the point of design, we posit that this is where a real difference in urban development can be made. To this end, we present a transformative model that merges urban design and ecology into an inclusive, creative, knowledge-to-action process. This design-ecology nexus—an ecology for cities—will redefine both the process and its products. In this paper we: (1) summarize the relationships among design, infrastructure, and urban development, emphasizing the importance of joining the three to achieve urban climate resilience and enhance sustainability; (2) discuss how urban ecology can move from an ecology of cities to an ecology for cities based on a knowledge-to-action agenda; (3) detail our model for a transformational urban design-ecology nexus, and; (4) demonstrate the efficacy of our model with several case studies.

References

51