Publication | Closed Access
A measure of restorative quality in environments
794
Citations
24
References
1997
Year
Quality Of LifeRestorative QualityQuality MetricEnvironmental PsychologySensory ExperiencesPsychometricsQuality EvaluationSocial SciencesPsychologyBuilt EnvironmentRestorative PracticesEnvironmental BehaviorFactor AnalysisHealth SciencesEnvironmentBehavioral SciencesPerceived Restorativeness ScalePsychosocial ResearchPerformance StudiesQuality CharacteristicRestorative EnvironmentsAffect Perception
Restorative environments help renew psychological resources depleted in environments that do not fully support intended functions. The study aims to develop and validate the Perceived Restorativeness Scale (PRS) to aid design and theory of restorative environments. Four studies assessed the PRS’s reliability and validity using factor analysis, criterion, convergent, and discriminant tests across diverse sites differing in natural‑urban and indoor‑outdoor dimensions. Across diverse populations and presentation modes, the PRS consistently demonstrated strong validity coefficients and sensitivity to meaningful environmental differences.
Restorative environments help renew psychological resources depleted in environments that do not fully support intended functions. The design of restorative environments can be aided and underlying theory elaborated with a means for measuring psychological factors thought to work in restorative experiences. This paper reports on four studies carried out to develop such a measure, the Perceived Restorativeness Scale (PRS). Each study employed several strategies for assessing reliability and validity. Factor analysis was used to examine the stability of the measure's factor structure across different sites and studies. To assess criterion, convergent, and discriminant validities, measures of emotional states and other environmental qualities were also completed for each site. The sites selected for evaluation differed on theoretically relevant dimensions (natural‐urban; outdoor‐indoor), enabling checks on the PRS's sensitivity to meaningful differences among environments. The results were consistent across the studies, which also involved different subject populations (American, Swedish, Finnish) and presentation modes (on‐site, video, photographic slides). Although the factor analytic results introduce some interpretive qualifications, substantial validity coefficients and sensitivity to meaningful differences between sites speak to the utility of the measure.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1