Behaviour Research and Therapy · 1997 · 352 citations · 40 references
Social SciencesBehavioral SciencesPsychologyChild PsychiatryPediatric Mental HealthPsychometricsAnxiety AssessmentAnxiety DisordersAnxiety SymptomsChild PsychopathologyPsychological TestingChildhood Anxiety DisordersGeneralized Anxiety Disorder AssessmentGeneralized Anxiety SymptomsInternal Consistency ReliabilityPediatric Anxiety AssessmentPediatric Anxiety DisordersReliability TestingSelf-report Anxiety Questionnaires
An adaptation of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire for children and adolescents (PSWQ‑C) was evaluated in two studies to assess its suitability for younger populations. Study 1 examined the factor structure, internal consistency, and convergent and discriminant validity of the PSWQ‑C in a school sample of 199 children, while Study 2 compared PSWQ‑C scores among 14 children with generalized anxiety disorder, 10 with other anxiety disorders, and 10 controls to evaluate its clinical discriminative power. The PSWQ‑C proved unifactorial, with favorable reliability and validity in both samples, and produced significantly higher scores for children with generalized anxiety disorder than for those with other anxiety disorders or normal controls.
An adaptation of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire (Meyer, Miller, Metzger & Borkovec, 1990, Behaviour Research and Therapy, 28, 487–495) for use with children and adolescents was evaluated in two studies (Penn State Worry Questionnaire for Children: PSWQ-C). Study 1 involved the examination of factor structure, internal consistency, and convergent and discriminant validity in a school sample (N = 199). The measure was found to be unifactorial and to possess favorable reliability and validity. Study 2 evaluated the PSWQ-C in a clinical sample and found significantly higher scores in children with generalized anxiety disorder (n = 14) than children with other anxiety disorders (n = 10) and normal controls (n = 10). The PSWQ-C also demonstrated good convergent and discriminant validity and excellent reliability in the clinical sample.
40
Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit
Michael W. Browne, Robert Cudeck · Sociological Methods & Research · 1992 · 25.2K citations
Testing Structural Equation Models.
Clifford C. Clogg, Kenneth A. Bollen, J. Scott Long · Social Forces · 1995 · 8.3K citations
Development and validation of the penn state worry questionnaire
Thomas Meyer, Mark L. Miller, R. Metzger et al. · Behaviour Research and Therapy · 1990 · 5.1K citations