Computational Methods for Fracture in Brittle and Quasi-Brittle Solids: State-of-the-Art Review and Future Perspectives

Timon Rabczuk

ISRN Applied Mathematics · 2013 · 230 citations · 292 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

Computational methods for modeling fracture in brittle and quasi‑brittle materials are reviewed. The paper aims to review computational techniques for discrete fracture, addressing numerical challenges, crack‑tracking methods, and cracking criteria, and to outline future research directions. It surveys continuum fracture models—including regularization, element erosion, inter‑element separation, EFEM, XFEM, meshfree, BEM, isogeometric, and variational approaches—highlighting their advantages and drawbacks.

Abstract

An overview of computational methods to model fracture in brittle and quasi-brittle materials is given. The overview focuses on continuum models for fracture. First, numerical difficulties related to modelling fracture for quasi-brittle materials will be discussed. Different techniques to eliminate or circumvent those difficulties will be described subsequently. In that context, regularization techniques such as nonlocal models, gradient enhanced models, viscous models, cohesive zone models, and smeared crack models will be discussed. The main focus of this paper will be on computational methods for discrete fracture (discrete cracks). Element erosion technques, inter-element separation methods, the embedded finite element method (EFEM), the extended finite element method (XFEM), meshfree methods (MMs), boundary elements (BEMs), isogeometric analysis, and the variational approach to fracture will be reviewed elucidating advantages and drawbacks of each approach. As tracking the crack path is of major concern in computational methods that preserve crack path continuity, one section will discuss different crack tracking techniques. Finally, cracking criteria will be reviewed before the paper ends with future research perspectives.

References

292