Publication | Closed Access
Putting the Public Back into Governance: The Challenges of Citizen Participation and Its Future
1.1K
Citations
19
References
2015
Year
Public EngagementEducationPublic ParticipationPolitical BehaviorParticipatory Decision-makingCitizen ParticipationSocial SciencesPublic BackDemocracyPublic GovernanceDigital TechnologyCollaborative GovernanceCivic EngagementPublic PolicyCommunity EngagementPolitical ParticipationCommunity ParticipationPublic SectorPolitical ScienceSocial Justice
The past two decades have seen a proliferation of participatory governance experiments, driven by public sector constraints, rising citizen engagement demands, and digital technology, yet the impact on legitimacy and social justice remains uncertain. This article reviews claims that citizen participation can enhance democratic effectiveness, legitimacy, and social justice. It identifies three challenges to successful participatory governance: lack of systematic leadership, absence of consensus on direct participation, and limited scope and powers of participatory innovations.
Abstract The past two decades have seen a proliferation of large‐ and small‐scale experiments in participatory governance. This article takes stock of claims about the potential of citizen participation to advance three values of democratic governance: effectiveness, legitimacy, and social justice. Increasing constraints on the public sector in many societies, combined with increasing demand for individual engagement and the affordances of digital technology, have paved the way for participatory innovations aimed at effective governance. Deepening legitimation deficits of representative government create opportunities for legitimacy‐enhancing forms of citizen participation, but so far, the effect of participation on legitimacy is unclear. Efforts to increase social justice through citizen participation face the greatest obstacles. The article concludes by highlighting three challenges to creating successful participatory governance: the absence of systematic leadership, the lack of popular or elite consensus on the place of direct citizen participation, and the limited scope and powers of participatory innovations .
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1