Between Chinese culture and the rule of law

Mike Berrell, Jeff Wrathall

Management Research News · 2006 · 36 citations · 26 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Let's collect: Purpose: lines with Purpose label: - "Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine aspects of the social, cultural, political and legal architecture of intellectual property rights (IPR) in China." - "The paper aims to identify inhibiting and facilitating factors in the Chinese environment as they pertain to establishing of a workable regime for IPR in China." - "The paper also offers some practical strategies that foreign managers can employ to reduce the risk of piracy of intellectual property (IP) in China.Design/methodology/approach – A literature review of the main influences on the formation of Chinese attitudes to IPR are identified and discussed." - "Through such knowledge, this group will be better equipped to contribute to the process of establishing new norms of respect for IPR in China in the medium term." - "Armed with this knowledge, foreign managers are better placed to negotiate the difficult and complex Chinese business environment." Also [Findings, Purpose] lines: "Through such knowledge, this group will be better equipped..." and "Armed with this knowledge..." already included. So Purpose summary: The study examines how China’s social, cultural, political, and legal structures shape attitudes toward IPR, identifies barriers and enablers for a workable regime, and proposes low‑cost strategies for foreign managers to reduce piracy and foster respect for IPR. Mechanism: lines with Mechanism label: - "[Purpose, Mechanism] The paper aims to identify inhibiting and facilitating factors in the Chinese environment as they pertain to establishing of a workable regime for IPR in China." - "[Purpose, Mechanism] The paper also offers some practical strategies that foreign managers can employ to reduce the risk of piracy of intellectual property (IP) in China.Design/methodology/approach – A literature review of the main influences on the formation of Chinese attitudes to IPR are identified and discussed." - "[Mechanism, Findings] Against this background, a model for the establishment of a new regime for IPR in China is proposed." So mechanism: literature review of influences on Chinese attitudes to IPR, identification of inhibiting/facilitating factors, and proposal of a model for a new regime. Findings: lines with Findings: - "Findings – While the cultural architecture of IPR in China is often identified as the major influence on the level of IP piracy, other aspects of the Chinese political, business and social environment may actually facilitate the acceptance of, and respect for, IPR." - "Indeed, the experience of Taiwan in building new norms for IPR suggests that a new regime for IPR in China is clearly possible." - "[Findings, Background] Nevertheless, while the potential to reduce IP piracy exists, foreign managers must continue to remain vigilant in the marketplace and use a combination of strategies to protect IP as new norms of respect for IPR emerge in the coming period." - "[Findings, Purpose] Through such knowledge, this group will be better equipped to contribute to the process of establishing new norms of respect for IPR in China in the medium term." - "[Findings, Purpose] Armed with this knowledge, foreign managers are better placed to negotiate the difficult and complex Chinese business environment." - "This study contributes to the literature on IPR in China." - "Originality/value – This paper presents a model for developing a workable IPR regime in China and describes low‐cost strategies to reduce the current level of IP piracy." So findings: Cultural architecture is major influence on piracy, but other factors can facilitate respect; Taiwan experience shows new regime possible; foreign managers need vigilance and strategies; model and low-cost strategies presented.

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine aspects of the social, cultural, political and legal architecture of intellectual property rights (IPR) in China. The paper aims to identify inhibiting and facilitating factors in the Chinese environment as they pertain to establishing of a workable regime for IPR in China. The paper also offers some practical strategies that foreign managers can employ to reduce the risk of piracy of intellectual property (IP) in China.Design/methodology/approach – A literature review of the main influences on the formation of Chinese attitudes to IPR are identified and discussed. Against this background, a model for the establishment of a new regime for IPR in China is proposed.Findings – While the cultural architecture of IPR in China is often identified as the major influence on the level of IP piracy, other aspects of the Chinese political, business and social environment may actually facilitate the acceptance of, and respect for, IPR. Indeed, the experience of Taiwan in building new norms for IPR suggests that a new regime for IPR in China is clearly possible. This is because new norms of respect for IPR can emerge when sufficient facilitating factors are present in the environment. Nevertheless, while the potential to reduce IP piracy exists, foreign managers must continue to remain vigilant in the marketplace and use a combination of strategies to protect IP as new norms of respect for IPR emerge in the coming period.Research limitations/implications – Foreign managers in China can gain significant advantages by understanding the deeper influences of the social, cultural, political and legal architecture on the formation of attitudes to IP and IPR in China. Through such knowledge, this group will be better equipped to contribute to the process of establishing new norms of respect for IPR in China in the medium term.Practical implications – This study contributes to the literature on IPR in China. Armed with this knowledge, foreign managers are better placed to negotiate the difficult and complex Chinese business environment.Originality/value – This paper presents a model for developing a workable IPR regime in China and describes low‐cost strategies to reduce the current level of IP piracy.

References

26