The Impact of Higher Standards in Patent Protection for Pharmaceutical Industries under the TRIPS Agreement – A Comparative Study of China and India

Xuan Li

World Economy · 2008 · 24 citations · 15 references

Concepts

TL;DR

The study compares Chinese and Indian pharmaceutical industries under differing patent regimes and recommends that governments use TRIPS flexibilities and price controls to mitigate anticompetitive effects. Compared to India, China’s earlier product‑patent regime has led to lower drug accessibility, availability, R&D investment, and domestic patent filings, indicating that higher patent protection negatively impacts its pharmaceutical industry.

Abstract

A comparative study is undertaken that explores Chinese and Indian pharmaceutical industries under different patent regimes. It is found that relative to India, which had implemented process patent protection until 2005, China with a product patent regime since 1993 suffers from both lower drug accessibility and availability (the latter is a missing parameter in the literature). Also, China lags behind in both lower R&D investment and patents filed by Chinese nationals. Based on these findings and associated legal interpretation, we conclude that higher patent protection in China generates negative impacts on the pharmaceutical industries. Thus, governments should utilise TRIPS flexibilities and other regimes such as price control to offset the anticompetitive effect in designing patent policies.

References

15