Constructing Masculinity in the Building Trades: ‘Most Jobs in the Construction Industry Can Be Done by Women’

Kate Ness

Gender Work and Organization · 2011 · 140 citations · 25 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Construction in the UK is overwhelmingly male‑dominated, with over 99 % of building‑trade workers being men, and its culture of high safety risk and long hours appeals to certain employers. The article examines how discourse reflects and reproduces the absence of women in construction trades. Using critical discourse analysis, the authors examine an industry report excerpt that claims “most jobs in the construction industry can be done by women,” situating it within structural, institutional, and historical contexts to reveal its reliance on presuppositions about women’s abilities. The analysis shows that male construction workers construct masculinity around toughness, and that the claim women can do most jobs actually reinforces gender segregation by reproducing dominant ideology, thereby sustaining existing power relations.

Abstract

Construction is one of the most gender‐segregated sectors of the UK economy; men constitute over 99 per cent of the employees in the building trades. This article focuses on the role of discourse in reflecting and reproducing the absence of women in the construction trades. A small excerpt from an industry report is described, interpreted and explained using critical discourse analysis. The analysis takes as its starting point one phrase, ‘most jobs in the construction industry can be done by women’ and places it in its structural, institutional and historic context, showing its dependence on presuppositions about women's abilities, and the ideological basis of those assumptions. Male construction workers' masculine identity is defined in relation to their ‘tough’ job. The culture of taking safety risks, and working long hours in primitive working conditions suits some employers very well. The report's assertion that women can do ‘most jobs’ in construction appears to challenge the dominant ideology but it actually reproduces it, helping to maintain gender segregation. Thus it contributes in a small way to sustaining existing power relations by containing potentially transformative movements.

References

25