Publication | Closed Access
Modern River Deltas: Variability of Processes and Sand Bodies
339
Citations
0
References
1975
Year
Unknown Venue
EngineeringGeomorphologyModern River DeltasAbstract Depositional FaciesCoastal GeomorphologyEarth ScienceSediment AnalysisRiverine SedimentGeographyCoastal DepositHydrologySedimentologySediment TransportCoastal ManagementMorphodynamicsDepositional ProcessSediment ProcessVertical SequencesSedimentation
Deltaic depositional facies arise from dynamic processes—climate, hydrology, wave and tidal energy—that modify and disperse riverine sediment, vary in intensity and frequency, and ultimately control the sedimentary framework, as illustrated by deltas such as Mississippi, Klang, Ord, Burdekin, Sao Francisco, and Senegal. The study compared approximately 400 process and form parameters across 50 major deltas to investigate inter‑delta differences and generate distinctive deltaic frameworks. The authors compared these parameters in 50 deltas and conducted field studies in 16 deltas to validate the data and collect additional subsurface and spatial information. The study found that no universal delta model predicts vertical sequences across all deltas, and that sand‑body distribution, geometry, and characteristics are mainly controlled by wave‑energy distributions, river‑mouth dynamics, subsidence, and alongshore currents.
Abstract Depositional facies in deltaic sediments result from interacting dynamic processes (climate, hydrologic characteristics, wave energy, tidal action, etc.) which modify and disperse transported riverine sediment. These processes, which vary in both intensity and frequency, control the eventual sedimentary framework of a delta. Approximately 400 similar process and form parameters were compared in 50 significant deltas to investigate the differences among the deltas and to generate distinctive deltaic frameworks. In addition, field studies were conducted in 16 of the deltas to field check the data and to gather additional subsurface and spatial data. The results of this study indicated that no one delta model could be formulated to use as a basis for predicting vertical sequences in all of the deltas. The study also indicated that sand-body distribution, geometry, and characteristics are primarily a function of wave-energy distributions, river-mouth dynamics, subsidence, and alongshore currents. The following deltas are used as examples in illustrating the common deltaic vertical sequences: Mississippi, Klang, Ord, Burdekin, Sao Francisco, and Senegal.