International Journal of Audiology · 2015 · 23 citations · 20 references
Health ProfessionsAudiologyEducational AssessmentHearing SciencePediatric AudiologyPsychometricsAudiologic EvaluationAuditory DevelopmentCentral Auditory Processing In ChildrenHearing ImpairmentPediatric Diagnostic AudiologyPediatric Hearing AssessmentAuditory Signal ProcessingBehavioral Auditory AssessmentConstruct ValidityDiagnostic Audiology In ChildrenPediatric Audiologic AssessmentPediatric Auditory ProcessingTest-retest ReliabilityTest-retest Reliability In Audiology
OBJECTIVE: This research investigates a novel method for identifying and measuring school-aged children with poor auditory processing through a tablet computer. DESIGN: Feasibility and test-retest reliability are investigated by examining the percentage of Group 1 participants able to complete the tasks and developmental effects on performance. Concurrent validity was investigated against traditional tests of auditory processing using Group 2. STUDY SAMPLE: There were 847 students aged 5 to 13 years in group 1, and 46 aged 5 to 14 years in group 2. RESULTS: Some tasks could not be completed by the youngest participants. Significant correlations were found between results of most auditory processing areas assessed by the Feather Squadron test and traditional auditory processing tests. Test-retest comparisons indicated good reliability for most of the Feather Squadron assessments and some of the traditional tests. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate the Feather Squadron assessment is a time-efficient, feasible, concurrently valid, and reliable approach for measuring auditory processing in school-aged children. Clinically, this may be a useful option for audiologists when performing auditory processing assessments as it is a relatively fast, engaging, and easy way to assess auditory processing abilities. Research is needed to investigate further the construct validity of this new assessment by examining the association between performance on Feather Squadron and objective evoked potential, lesion studies, and/or functional imaging measures of auditory function.
20
“The Medical Journal of Australia”
The Medical Journal of Australia · 1923 · 1.6K citations
Mead C. Killion, Patricia A. Niquette, Gail I. Gudmundsen et al. · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2004 · 855 citations
Health Professions, Audiology, Speech-language Pathology +17
Assessment of Central Auditory Dysfunction
Frank E. Musiek · Ear and Hearing · 1983 · 346 citations
Medicine, Neurology, Neuroscience +16