PubMed · 2011 · 30 citations · 33 references
MedicineCardiologyGeriatric MedicineGeriatric CareGeriatricsInterventional CardiologyAcute Coronary Syndrome InterventionCardiovascular AgingCardiovascular DiseaseCoronary Artery DiseaseIschemic Heart DiseasePercutaneous Coronary InterventionAcute Coronary Syndrome ManagementCardiovascular Disease ManagementCardiovascular Disease MortalityClinical Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary InterventionCulprit Lesion RevascularizationElderly Patient Risk AssessmentOlder Adult CarePercutaneous Coronary Intervention Care
Persons aged 65 years or older, often referred to as the elderly, are a rapidly increasing population in the United States. Cardiovascular disease is the most common cause of morbidity and death in this age group, and acute coronary syndrome accounts for a significant proportion of the deaths. Percutaneous coronary intervention is a well-established treatment for acute coronary syndrome and symptomatic coronary artery disease. However, community studies have shown that elderly patients are less likely to undergo revascularization, perhaps due to a "treatment-risk" paradox: elderly patients-at higher risk of morbidity and death from acute coronary syndrome-are denied revascularization even though they are likely to benefit from it. Age alone is one of the many reasons why percutaneous coronary intervention is avoided in elderly patients. This review examines past clinical trials and the existing evidence that supports performing percutaneous coronary intervention in elderly patients.
33
Robert Altman, L Carreras, Rubén Sierra Díaz et al. · Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford) · 1994 · 3.3K citations
Christopher P. Cannon, William S. Weintraub, Laura A. Demopoulos et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2001 · 2.1K citations · Full text