New England Journal of Medicine · 2001 · 2.1K citations · 32 references
MedicineCardiologyInternal MedicineCardiovascular PharmacotherapyClinical CardiologyInterventional CardiologyAcute Coronary SyndromesAnticoagulant TherapyAntiplatelet TherapyAntithrombotic TherapyCoronary Artery DiseaseIschemic Heart DiseaseAcute Coronary Syndrome Antithrombotic TherapyAcute Coronary Syndrome ManagementAntiplatelet Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary InterventionCoronary Artery Disease PharmacotherapyMyocardial Infarction PharmacotherapyPost-myocardial Infarction PharmacotherapyPost-percutaneous Coronary Intervention Antithrombotic Therapy
BACKGROUND: There is continued debate as to whether a routine, early invasive strategy is superior to a conservative strategy for the management of unstable angina and myocardial infarction without ST-segment elevation. METHODS: We enrolled 2220 patients with unstable angina and myocardial infarction without ST-segment elevation who had electrocardiographic evidence of changes in the ST segment or T wave, elevated levels of cardiac markers, a history of coronary artery disease, or all three findings. All patients were treated with aspirin, heparin, and the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor tirofiban. They were randomly assigned to an early invasive strategy, which included routine catheterization within 4 to 48 hours and revascularization as appropriate, or to a more conservative (selectively invasive) strategy, in which catheterization was performed only if the patient had objective evidence of recurrent ischemia or an abnormal stress test. The primary end point was a composite of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and rehospitalization for an acute coronary syndrome at six months. RESULTS: At six months, the rate of the primary end point was 15.9 percent with use of the early invasive strategy and 19.4 percent with use of the conservative strategy (odds ratio, 0.78; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.62 to 0.97; P=0.025). The rate of death or nonfatal myocardial infarction at six months was similarly reduced (7.3 percent vs. 9.5 percent; odds ratio, 0.74; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.54 to 1.00; P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with unstable angina and myocardial infarction without ST-segment elevation who were treated with the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor tirofiban, the use of an early invasive strategy significantly reduced the incidence of major cardiac events. These data support a policy involving broader use of the early inhibition of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa in combination with an early invasive strategy in such patients.
32
Patrick W. Serruys, Peter de Jaegere, Ferdinand Kiemeneij et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 1994 · 4.5K citations · Full text
The TIMI Risk Score for Unstable Angina/Non–ST Elevation MI
Elliott M. Antman, Marc Cohen, Peter J. L. M. Bernink et al. · JAMA · 2000 · 3.2K citations