Land Use Policy · 2015 · 253 citations · 51 references
Ecosystem‑based adaptation (EbA) measures are increasingly promoted for their environmental and socio‑economic co‑benefits, and recent literature shows growing interest in assessing urban climate adaptation plans, yet little is known about how EbA is incorporated into such plans. The study develops a framework to analyze how European urban climate adaptation plans incorporate EbA measures and outlines future work to broaden the classification and sample. The framework classifies EbA measures and scores their representation across plan components. The analysis shows that while plans generally recognize EbA’s potential, they often lack baseline data and concrete implementation actions, and the paper recommends improving baseline information, co‑benefit treatment, and coordination with other planning tools.
Ecosystem-based adaptation (EbA) measures have been increasingly promoted in the literature, as well as in policies and practices, for their environmental and socio-economic co-benefits. The recent scientific literature has shown a growing interest to assess climate adaptation plans at the urban level, in recognition of the important role played by urban areas in addressing climate change challenges. However, little information is available on the combination of these two issues, i.e., the actual inclusion of EbA measures in climate adaptation plans at the urban level. This paper addresses this gap by developing a framework to analyze the treatment of EbA in urban level climate planning, and apply it to a sample of climate adaptation plans in Europe. The framework consists of a classification of EbA measures, and a scoring system to evaluate how well they are reflected in different components of the plans. The results suggest that there is in general good awareness in plans of EbA measures, and of their potential role in addressing climate change challenges. However, their treatment in climate adaptation plans at the urban level often lacks sufficient baseline information, as well as convincing implementation actions. The paper concludes by offering recommendations to improve future practice, in terms of enhancing the baseline information to improve the proposal and design of EbA measures, improving the treatment of co-benefits associated to EbA measures, and strengthening coordination with other planning tools. Possible future development of this works include the integration of the proposed EbA classification, and the analysis of a larger sample of territorial plans.
51
Adapting Cities for Climate Change: The Role of the Green Infrastructure
Stephen Gill, J. F. Handley, A. Roland Ennos et al. · Built Environment · 2007 · 1.9K citations
Street design and urban canopy layer climate
T. R. Oke · Energy and Buildings · 1988 · 1.7K citations
The Hot Summer of 2010: Redrawing the Temperature Record Map of Europe
David Barriopedro, Erich Fischer, Jürg Luterbacher et al. · Science · 2011 · 1.7K citations · Full text