Watchdog or Lapdog? Media Freedom, Regime Type, and Government Respect for Human Rights

Jenifer Whitten‐Woodring

International Studies Quarterly · 2009 · 168 citations · 36 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Press freedom is justified as a watchdog over governments, yet the alignment between regime type and media control is inconsistent, and violations of physical integrity rights are a major concern. The study investigates how media freedom influences government respect for physical integrity rights. The authors theorize that the effect of media freedom on human‑rights respect depends on the presence of democratic institutions. The results show that media freedom negatively affects rights respect in the most autocratic regimes and positively in the most democratic regimes.

Abstract

A main justification for press freedom is that free media will act as a watchdog over the government. While we would expect democracies to have free media and autocracies to have government-controlled media, some democracies have government-controlled media, and some autocracies have free media. How this mismatch between regime type and media system influences government behavior is a puzzle worth exploring. One of the most widely criticized government behaviors is the violation of physical integrity rights. The question posed here is, how does media freedom affect government respect for these rights? In this article, I theorize that the relationship between media freedom and government respect for human rights differs, depending on the presence of democratic institutions. The findings support my premise. Specifically, the influence of media freedom on government respect for human rights is negative for the most autocratic regimes and positive for only the most democratic regimes.

References

36