Transactions of the American Fisheries Society · 2014 · 26 citations · 42 references
Natural ResourcesEcologyZoologyFish BiologyFish EcologyFreshwater EcologyAbundance EstimationFish RecruitmentFreshwater Fish EcologyFreshwater Population EcologyLake FisheriesRecruitment EstimationDetectionFish Abundance EstimationFish Recruitment DynamicsFish Sampling TechniquesLake Fish RecruitmentNesting SuccessPopulation Abundance EstimationRiver Fish Ecology
Abstract Larval fish are frequently sampled in coastal tributaries to determine factors affecting recruitment, evaluate spawning success, and estimate production from spawning habitats. Imperfect detection of larvae is common, because larval fish are small and unevenly distributed in space and time, and coastal tributaries are often large and heterogeneous. We estimated detection probabilities of larval fish from several taxa in the Maumee and Detroit rivers, the two largest tributaries of Lake Erie. We then demonstrated how accounting for imperfect detection influenced (1) the probability of observing taxa as present relative to sampling effort and (2) abundance indices for larval fish of two Detroit River species. We found that detection probabilities ranged from 0.09 to 0.91 but were always less than 1.0, indicating that imperfect detection is common among taxa and between systems. In general, taxa with high fecundities, small larval length at hatching, and no nesting behaviors had the highest detection probabilities. Also, detection probabilities were higher in the Maumee River than in the Detroit River. Accounting for imperfect detection produced up to fourfold increases in abundance indices for Lake Whitefish Coregonus clupeaformis and Gizzard Shad Dorosoma cepedianum. The effect of accounting for imperfect detection in abundance indices was greatest during periods of low abundance for both species. Detection information can be used to determine the appropriate level of sampling effort for larval fishes and may improve management and conservation decisions based on larval fish data. Received August 12, 2013; accepted March 7, 2014
42
ESTIMATING SITE OCCUPANCY RATES WHEN DETECTION PROBABILITIES ARE LESS THAN ONE
Darryl I. MacKenzie, James D. Nichols, Gideon B. Lachman et al. · Ecology · 2002 · 4.4K citations
ESTIMATING SITE OCCUPANCY, COLONIZATION, AND LOCAL EXTINCTION WHEN A SPECIES IS DETECTED IMPERFECTLY
Darryl I. MacKenzie, James D. Nichols, James E. Hines et al. · Ecology · 2003 · 1.7K citations
Life Sciences, Ecology, Zoology +13
Edward D. Houde · Journal of Northwest Atlantic Fishery Science · 2008 · 812 citations · Full text
Life Sciences, Biology, Ecology +8