NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA) · 1997 · 12 citations · 41 references
ComputingComputer ScienceVisualizationComputer GraphicsRenderingVolume Visualization3D RenderingImage QualityImage Quality AssessmentVolume RenderingVolumetric RenderingVolumetric VisualizationBenchmark DatasetsClassification-based RenderingClassification-based Volume RenderingDifference ComputationImportance Measures
The goal of this paper is to provide a foundation for objectively comparing volume rendered images. The key elements of the foundation are: (1) a rigorous specification of all the parameters that need to be specified to define the conditions under which a volume rendered image is generated; (2) a methodology for difference classification, including a suite of functions or metrics to quantify and classify the difference between two volume rendered images that will support an analysis of the relative importance of particular differences. The results of this method can be used to study the changes caused by modifying particular parameter values, to compare and quantify changes between images of similar data sets rendered in the same way, and even to detect errors in the design, implementation or modification of a volume rendering system. If one has a benchmark image, for example one created by a high accuracy volume rendering system, the method can be used to evaluate the accuracy of a given image.
41
C. D. Kemp, Edward R. Tufte · Biometrics · 1992 · 2.7K citations
Robert A. Drebin, Loren Carpenter, Pat Hanrahan · ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics · 1988 · 1.6K citations
Computing, Anatomy, Neuroscience +12
Thomas Porter, Tom Duff · 1984 · 1.2K citations
J. Ronald Eastman, Jacques Bertin · Economic Geography · 1986 · 1.1K citations