Publication | Open Access
All’s well that ends well? Comments on the ILC’s articles on state responsibility
40
Citations
0
References
2002
Year
LawInternational CrimesSocial Sciences’ SGovernmental ProcessGovernment RegulationInternational Criminal LawPolicy ProcessPublic PolicyCrime Against HumanityInternational RelationsInternational Criminal CourtsInternational LawState ResponsibilityIlc ’Public International LawAggravated ResponsibilityPolicy StudiesOn State ResponsibilityAccountabilityInternational Criminal PracticeInternational OrganizationPolitical ScienceSocial Responsibility
This paper provides an analysis of te UN International Law Commission's (ILC's) ARTICLES ON STATE RESPONSIBILITY adopted after second reading in 2001. After having introduced the topic of state responsibility and the role of the ILC, it addresses the more pressing issues confronted during the second reading of the Articles. These include: (i) the question of aggravated responsibility for serious breaches of obligations under permeptory norms (a concept grown out of the ILC's earlier attempt to introduce a category of international crimes); (ii) the rules on countermeasures; and (iii) the implementation of responsibility for breaches of collective obligations, notably those owed erga omnes.