Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging · 2009 · 64 citations · 15 references
MedicineBioengineeringRadiologyBiomedical ImagingDiagnostic ImagingDiagnostic RadiologyBreast AssessmentBreast ImagingMagnetic Resonance Contrast MechanismsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMedical ImagingB1 Field Inhomogeneity CompensationBreast Tissue ImagingGradient Echo SequencesMagnetic Field InhomogeneitySignal-to-noise Ratio EnhancementSolid PhantomsSpoiled Gradient Echo ImagingT1 Contrast
PURPOSE: To quantify B(1) transmission-field inhomogeneity in breast imaging of normal volunteers at 3T using 3D T(1)-weighted spoiled gradient echo and to assess the resulting errors in enhancement ratio (ER) measured in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) studies of the breast. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 25 volunteers underwent breast imaging at 3T and the B(1) transmission-fields were mapped. Gel phantoms that simulate pre- and postcontrast breast tissue T(1) were developed. The effects of B(1)-field inhomogeneity on ER, as measured using a 3D spoiled gradient echo sequence, were investigated by computer simulation and experiments on gel phantoms. RESULTS: It was observed that by using the patient orientation and MR scanner employed in this study, the B(1) transmission-field field is always reduced toward the volunteer's right side. The median B(1)-field in the right breast is reduced around 40% of the expected B(1)-field. For some volunteers the amplitude was reduced by more than 50%. Computer simulation and experiment showed that a reduction in B(1)-field decreases ER. This reduction increases with both B(1)-field error and contrast agent uptake. CONCLUSION: B(1) transmission-field inhomogeneity is a critical issue in breast imaging at 3T and causes errors in quantifying ER. These errors would be sufficient to reduce the conspicuity of a malignant lesion and could result in reduced sensitivity for cancer detection.
15
Pharmacokinetic Parameters in CNS Gd-DTPA Enhanced MR Imaging
Gunnar Brix, Wolfhard Semmler, Rüdiger E. Port et al. · Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography · 1991 · 665 citations
Francesco Sardanelli, Gian Marco Giuseppetti, Pietro Panizza et al. · American Journal of Roentgenology · 2004 · 443 citations