Transcendental Deduction

Transcendental Deduction is a philosophical argument in Kantian epistemology that belongs to the class of transcendental justifications, specifically identifying the necessary conditions under which the categories of the understanding can be objectively valid in relation to experience.

73

Publications

3.5K

Citations

64

Authors

34

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

11

Authors

64

  1. HE
    Henry E. Allison

    University of California San Diego, United States

    4 publications · 306 citations

    4

    h-index

  2. AW
    Allen W. Wood

    Stanford University, United States

    3 publications · 185 citations

    3

    h-index

  3. CW
    Corey W. Dyck

    Western University, Canada

    2 publications · 93 citations

    2

    h-index

  4. KA
    Karl Ameriks

    University of Notre Dame, United States

    2 publications · 220 citations

    2

    h-index

  5. HR
    Hoke Robinson

    University of Memphis, United States

    2 publications · 23 citations

    2

    h-index

1–5 of 64

Venues

  1. Kant-Studien

    10 publications · 418 citations

    10

    h-index

  2. Kantian Review

    8 publications · 383 citations

    8

    h-index

  3. Inquiry

    6 publications · 193 citations

    6

    h-index

  4. The Philosophical Review

    6 publications · 595 citations

    6

    h-index

  5. Journal of the history of philosophy

    JHP · 4 publications · 282 citations

    4

    h-index

1–5