Concepedia

Survey Frame Evaluation

Survey Frame Evaluation is a methodological process in survey research that assesses the completeness and accuracy of a sampling frame in relation to the target population to identify and mitigate coverage errors affecting survey estimates.

23

Publications

1K

Citations

62

Authors

27

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

4

Variants

Sampling Frame Evaluation

Parents

Publications

23

A Comparison of Address-Based Sampling (ABS) Versus Random-Digit Dialing (RDD) for General Population Surveys

Michael Link, Maurizio Battaglia, Martin R. Frankel et al. · Public Opinion Quarterly · 2008 · 198 citations · Full text

, , +16

Surveying immigrants without sampling frames – evaluating the success of alternative field methods

David Reichel, Laura Morales · Comparative Migration Studies · 2017 · 143 citations · Full text

, , +15

Guidelines for improving the contextual relevance of field surveys: the case of information security policy violations

Mikko Siponen, Anthony Vance · European Journal of Information Systems · 2013 · 120 citations

, , +15

Nonresponse Bias in a Dual Frame Sample of Cell and Landline Numbers

J. Michael Brick, Sarah Dipko, Stanley Presser et al. · Public Opinion Quarterly · 2006 · 110 citations

, , +15

Inclusion of mobile phone numbers into an ongoing population health survey in New South Wales, Australia: design, methods, call outcomes, costs and sample representativeness

Margo Barr, Jason J van Ritten, David Steel et al. · BMC Medical Research Methodology · 2012 · 40 citations · Full text

, , +16

1–5 of 23

Authors

62

  1. YL
    Yannick Léonard

    Office National de la Chasse et de la Faune Sauvage, France

    2 publications · 58 citations

    2

    h-index

  2. TD
    Thierry Dahier

    Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, France

    2 publications · 58 citations

    2

    h-index

  3. GD
    Gilles Delacour

    Office National de la Chasse et de la Faune Sauvage, France

    2 publications · 58 citations

    2

    h-index

  4. BE
    Bonnie E. Shook‐Sa

    University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, United States

    2 publications · 32 citations

    2

    h-index

  5. JB
    Jérome Boyer

    Laboratoire d'Écologie Alpine, France

    2 publications · 58 citations

    2

    h-index

1–5 of 62

Institutions

27

  1. Westat (United States)

    Rockville, United States

    2 h-index

    4 publications

    67 citations

  2. RTI International

    Durham, United States

    1 h-index

    4 publications

    88 citations

  3. Queensland Health

    Brisbane, Australia

    1 h-index

    1 publications

    39 citations

  4. New South Wales Department of Health

    North Sydney, Australia

    1 h-index

    3 publications

    120 citations

  5. Hôpital Robert-Debré

    Paris, France

    1 h-index

    1 publications

    19 citations

  6. University of Maryland, College Park

    College Park, United States

    1 h-index

    1 publications

    110 citations

  7. Office National de la Chasse et de la Faune Sauvage

    Auffargis, France

    1 h-index

    8 publications

    216 citations

  8. The University of Western Australia

    Perth, Australia

    1 h-index

    1 publications

    39 citations

1–8 of 27

Venues

  1. Public Opinion Quarterly

    POQ · 3 publications · 330 citations

    3

    h-index

  2. Journal of Agricultural Economics

    JAE · 2 publications · 37 citations

    2

    h-index

  3. 2

    h-index

  4. European Journal of Information Systems

    EJIS · 1 publications · 120 citations

    1

    h-index

  5. 1

    h-index

1–5