Statutory Interpretation Critique is a scholarly framework within legal theory that systematically analyzes and challenges the assumptions, methodologies, and outcomes of statutory interpretation practices, distinguishing itself by its focus on the ideological, structural, and epistemic limitations inherent in formalist and textualist judicial reasoning.
46
Publications
1.3K
Citations
53
Authors
27
Institutions
Publications per year
2017–2026
4
Parents
Publications
46
The Rise and Fall of Textualism
Jonathan T. Molot · SSRN Electronic Journal · 2005 · 77 citations · Full text
Beyond Marbury: The Executive's Power to Say What the Law Is
Cass R. Sunstein · The Yale Law Journal · 2006 · 51 citations · Full text
Law, Constitutional Law, Public Law +16
1–5 of 46
Authors
53
- LM
3
h-index
- AC
2
h-index
- JH
2
h-index
- RM
1
h-index
- CD
1
h-index
1–5 of 53
Institutions
27
Georgetown University
Washington, United States
3 h-index
3 publications
108 citations
Yale University
New Haven, United States
3 h-index
3 publications
85 citations
Victoria University of Wellington
Wellington, New Zealand
2 h-index
2 publications
45 citations
University of Hong Kong
Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong
2 h-index
2 publications
32 citations
University of Chicago
Chicago, United States
2 h-index
3 publications
71 citations
Brooklyn Law School
Brooklyn, United States
2 h-index
2 publications
40 citations
University of Virginia
Charlottesville, United States
2 h-index
3 publications
38 citations
University of California, Berkeley
Berkeley, United States
2 h-index
2 publications
57 citations
1–8 of 27
Venues
- SSRN Electronic Journal
Repository · 10 publications · 320 citations
10
h-index
- eYLS (Yale Law School)
Repository · 4 publications · 52 citations
4
h-index
- The Yale Law Journal
2 publications · 79 citations
2
h-index
- Michigan Law Review
2 publications · 25 citations
2
h-index
- University of Toronto Law Journal
UTLJ · 2 publications · 50 citations
2
h-index
1–5