Standards Versus Rules
Standards Versus Rules is a theoretical framework in legal and institutional analysis that distinguishes between flexible, context-sensitive evaluative criteria (standards) and fixed, universally applicable prescriptions (rules) to critique formalist models in jurisprudence and governance.
96
Publications
5.3K
Citations
139
Authors
90
Institutions
Publications per year
2017–2026
14
Variants
Rules Versus Standards
96
Rules versus Standards: An Economic Analysis
Louis Kaplow · Duke Law Journal · 1992 · 793 citations · Full text
Law, Regulatory Policy, Lawmaking +10
Deterrence and Uncertain Legal Standards
The Journal of Law Economics and Organization · 1986 · 319 citations
Law, Business Law, Antitrust Law +9
1–5 of 96
139
5
h-index
4
h-index
3
h-index
3
h-index
3
h-index
1–5 of 139
90
The University of Texas at Austin
Austin, United States
6 h-index
8 publications
534 citations

University of Alberta
Edmonton, Canada
5 h-index
7 publications
332 citations
University of Iowa
Iowa City, United States
4 h-index
4 publications
344 citations
University of Chicago
Chicago, United States
3 h-index
3 publications
167 citations

Australian National University
Canberra, Australia
3 h-index
4 publications
210 citations
Nanyang Technological University
Singapore, Singapore
3 h-index
3 publications
199 citations
Northeastern University
Boston, United States
2 h-index
2 publications
63 citations

Lehigh University
Bethlehem, United States
2 h-index
2 publications
63 citations
1–8 of 90
Repository · 15 publications · 486 citations
12
h-index
4 publications · 673 citations
4
h-index
3 publications · 406 citations
3
h-index
2 publications · 158 citations
2
h-index
2 publications · 82 citations
2
h-index
1–5