Standards Versus Rules

Standards Versus Rules is a theoretical framework in legal and institutional analysis that distinguishes between flexible, context-sensitive evaluative criteria (standards) and fixed, universally applicable prescriptions (rules) to critique formalist models in jurisprudence and governance.

96

Publications

5.3K

Citations

139

Authors

90

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

14

Variants

Rules Versus Standards

Authors

139

  1. KJ
    Karim Jamal

    University of Alberta, Canada

    5 publications · 304 citations

    5

    h-index

  2. RM
    Richard Mergenthaler

    University of Iowa, United States

    4 publications · 312 citations

    4

    h-index

  3. DC
    Dain C. Donelson

    The University of Texas at Austin, United States

    3 publications · 253 citations

    3

    h-index

  4. JM
    John M. McInnis

    The University of Texas at Austin, United States

    3 publications · 253 citations

    3

    h-index

  5. MP
    Marietta Peytcheva

    Lehigh University, United States

    3 publications · 140 citations

    3

    h-index

1–5 of 139

Venues

  1. SSRN Electronic Journal

    Repository · 15 publications · 486 citations

    12

    h-index

  2. Accounting Horizons

    4 publications · 673 citations

    4

    h-index

  3. The Accounting Review

    3 publications · 406 citations

    3

    h-index

  4. Abacus

    2 publications · 158 citations

    2

    h-index

  5. Computer law & security review

    2 publications · 82 citations

    2

    h-index

1–5