Concepedia

Sonic Log Interpretation

Sonic Log Interpretation is a methodological framework within geophysical well logging that systematically analyzes acoustic travel-time measurements to infer subsurface formation properties, distinguishing itself by its focus on deriving lithologic, porosity, and fluid characteristics from sonic wave propagation data.

190

Publications

9.7K

Citations

507

Authors

211

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

33

Parents

Publications

190

The Equation for Geopressure Prediction from Well Logs

Ben Eaton · 1975 · 784 citations

, , +10

A new velocity model for clay‐sand mixtures<sup>1</sup>

Shiyu Xu · Geophysical Prospecting · 1995 · 526 citations

, , +17

SHEAR‐WAVE VELOCITY ESTIMATION IN POROUS ROCKS: THEORETICAL FORMULATION, PRELIMINARY VERIFICATION AND APPLICATIONS<sup>1</sup>

Matt L. Greenberg, John P. Castagna · Geophysical Prospecting · 1992 · 514 citations

, , +17

Synthetic sonic logs; a process for stratigraphic interpretation

Roy O. Lindseth · Geophysics · 1979 · 470 citations

, , +17

An Improved Sonic Transit Time-To-Porosity Transform

L.L. Raymer, E. Hunt, John S. Gardner · 1980 · 385 citations

, , +7

1–5 of 190

Authors

507

  1. TM
    Thomas M. Brocher

    United States Geological Survey, United States

    5 publications · 113 citations

    5

    h-index

  2. CT
    Carlos Torres‐Verdín

    The University of Texas at Austin, United States

    5 publications · 90 citations

    5

    h-index

  3. BK
    Bikash K. Sinha

    Schlumberger (United States), United States

    4 publications · 212 citations

    4

    h-index

  4. RR
    Robert R. Stewart

    University of Houston, United States

    4 publications · 208 citations

    4

    h-index

  5. AR
    A.L. Ruebel

    ATUM (United States), United States

    3 publications · 60 citations

    3

    h-index

1–5 of 507

Institutions

211

  1. Schlumberger (British Virgin Islands)

    Road Town, British Virgin Islands

    13 h-index

    35 publications

    1.8K citations

  2. Stanford University

    Stanford, United States

    7 h-index

    15 publications

    557 citations

  3. The University of Texas at Austin

    Austin, United States

    7 h-index

    16 publications

    336 citations

  4. United States Geological Survey

    Reston, United States

    6 h-index

    11 publications

    259 citations

  5. Schlumberger (United States)

    Houston, United States

    6 h-index

    13 publications

    1K citations

  6. ExxonMobil (United States)

    Irving, United States

    5 h-index

    6 publications

    181 citations

  7. The University of Adelaide

    Adelaide, Australia

    4 h-index

    6 publications

    107 citations

  8. Schlumberger (Norway)

    Tananger, Norway

    4 h-index

    9 publications

    1K citations

1–8 of 211

Venues

  1. Geophysics

    30 publications · 1.5K citations

    19

    h-index

  2. Journal of Petroleum Technology

    JPT · 14 publications · 790 citations

    12

    h-index

  3. Geophysical Research Letters

    10 publications · 448 citations

    10

    h-index

  4. The Leading Edge

    TLE · 7 publications · 311 citations

    7

    h-index

  5. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres

    JGR · 6 publications · 420 citations

    6

    h-index

1–5