Socratic Irony

Socratic Irony is a rhetorical and dialectical strategy in which a speaker feigns ignorance or naivety (genus: conversational technique) in order to elicit contradictions or deeper insights from an interlocutor, thereby exposing the limitations of their knowledge while implicitly asserting philosophical inquiry (differentia: feigned ignorance aimed at epistemic refutation and self-examination).

20

Publications

912

Citations

23

Authors

9

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

0

Authors

23

  1. AG
    A. G. Rud

    Purdue University West Lafayette, United States

    1 publications · 20 citations

    2

    h-index

  2. PG
    Paula Gottlieb

    University of Wisconsin–Madison, United States

    1 publications · 18 citations

    1

    h-index

  3. AL
    Andrew Linklater

    Aberystwyth University, United Kingdom

    1 publications · 162 citations

    1

    h-index

  4. WS
    William Smith

    Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR China

    1 publications · 50 citations

    1

    h-index

  5. RJ
    Roger J. Kreuz

    University of Memphis, United States

    1 publications · 116 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5 of 23

Venues

  1. The Classical Quarterly

    3 publications · 122 citations

    3

    h-index

  2. The Philosophical Review

    2 publications · 45 citations

    2

    h-index

  3. Phoenix

    2 publications · 122 citations

    2

    h-index

  4. Choice Reviews Online

    CRO · 2 publications · 120 citations

    2

    h-index

  5. Akroterion

    1 publications · 15 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5