Set-theoretic Paradox
A Set-Theoretic Paradox is a logical contradiction that arises within the formal framework of set theory when certain intuitive or axiomatically unrestricted principles of set formation lead to self-inconsistent results, distinguishing it from other paradoxes by its foundational challenge to the coherence of sets as mathematical objects.
48
Publications
2.5K
Citations
56
Authors
48
Institutions
Publications per year
2017–2026
6
Variants
Set-theoretic Antinomy
Parents
48
Hilary Putnam · Journal of Symbolic Logic · 1980 · 624 citations
Toward useful type-free theories. I
Solomon Feferman · Journal of Symbolic Logic · 1984 · 382 citations
Natural Sciences, Mathematics, Logic +12
THE POTENTIAL HIERARCHY OF SETS
Øystein Linnebo · The Review of Symbolic Logic · 2013 · 199 citations
Amanda Weir · Mind · 1998 · 119 citations
1–5 of 48
56
Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, China
2 publications · 23 citations
2
h-index
2
h-index
2
h-index
2
h-index
2
h-index
1–5 of 56
48
New York University
New York, United States
3 h-index
3 publications
64 citations

Slippery Rock University
Slippery Rock, United States
2 h-index
2 publications
23 citations

Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics
Nanjing, China
2 h-index
4 publications
46 citations
Nanjing Tech University
Nanjing, China
2 h-index
2 publications
23 citations
Nanjing University
Nanjing, China
2 h-index
2 publications
23 citations

University of St Andrews
St Andrews, United Kingdom
2 h-index
2 publications
59 citations

University of Hong Kong
Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong
2 h-index
2 publications
28 citations
Universidad Torcuato Di Tella
Buenos Aires, Argentina
1 h-index
1 publications
31 citations
1–8 of 48
6 publications · 1.1K citations
6
h-index
4 publications · 71 citations
4
h-index
CRO · 3 publications · 162 citations
3
h-index
3 publications · 77 citations
3
h-index
3 publications · 84 citations
3
h-index
1–5