Semantic Paradox

A Semantic Paradox is a self-referential or circular contradiction arising within a formal language when the truth conditions of a statement conflict with its own semantic interpretation, typically involving truth, reference, or predication.

65

Publications

4.2K

Citations

74

Authors

48

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

7

Authors

74

  1. ME
    Matti Eklund

    Cornell University, United States

    2 publications · 319 citations

    2

    h-index

  2. GP
    Graham Priest

    The University of Queensland, Australia

    2 publications · 105 citations

    2

    h-index

  3. EZ
    Elia Zardini

    University of Aberdeen, United Kingdom

    2 publications · 44 citations

    2

    h-index

  4. CS
    Charles S. Chihara

    University of California, Berkeley, United States

    2 publications · 234 citations

    2

    h-index

  5. DP
    Douglas Patterson

    Kansas State University, United States

    2 publications · 64 citations

    2

    h-index

1–5 of 74

Venues

  1. The Philosophical Review

    7 publications · 787 citations

    7

    h-index

  2. Australasian Journal of Philosophy

    6 publications · 521 citations

    6

    h-index

  3. Journal of Philosophical Logic

    4 publications · 269 citations

    4

    h-index

  4. Inquiry

    3 publications · 122 citations

    3

    h-index

  5. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic

    3 publications · 296 citations

    3

    h-index

1–5