Semantic Paradox
A Semantic Paradox is a self-referential or circular contradiction arising within a formal language when the truth conditions of a statement conflict with its own semantic interpretation, typically involving truth, reference, or predication.
65
Publications
4.2K
Citations
74
Authors
48
Institutions
Publications per year
2017–2026
7
Parents
65
Diana Raffman · The Philosophical Review · 1994 · 410 citations
Toward useful type-free theories. I
Solomon Feferman · Journal of Symbolic Logic · 1984 · 382 citations
Natural Sciences, Mathematics, Logic +12
David Ripley · Australasian Journal of Philosophy · 2012 · 309 citations · Full text
Humanities, Philosophy, Logic +16
Matti Eklund · Philosophy and Phenomenological Research · 2002 · 226 citations
Humanities, Philosophy, Logic +10
1–5 of 65
74
2
h-index
2
h-index
2
h-index
2
h-index
2
h-index
1–5 of 74
48
Universitat de Barcelona
Barcelona, Spain
3 h-index
3 publications
67 citations
Stanford University
Stanford, United States
3 h-index
4 publications
507 citations

University of Aberdeen
Aberdeen, United Kingdom
2 h-index
2 publications
46 citations
Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Philosophy
Prague, Czechia
2 h-index
2 publications
32 citations
City University of New York
New York, United States
2 h-index
2 publications
101 citations
New York University
New York, United States
2 h-index
2 publications
165 citations

The University of Queensland
Brisbane, Australia
2 h-index
3 publications
47 citations
Kansas State University
Manhattan, United States
2 h-index
2 publications
64 citations
1–8 of 48
7 publications · 787 citations
7
h-index
6 publications · 521 citations
6
h-index
4 publications · 269 citations
4
h-index
3 publications · 122 citations
3
h-index
3 publications · 296 citations
3
h-index
1–5