Concepedia

Screening Performance Metrics

Screening Performance Metrics is a standardized evaluative framework used to assess the efficacy, accuracy, and operational characteristics of breast tomosynthesis in asymptomatic populations by quantifying outcomes such as sensitivity, specificity, recall rate, and cancer detection rate.

538

Publications

39.9K

Citations

3.1K

Authors

1.1K

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

187

Parents

Publications

538

International evaluation of an AI system for breast cancer screening

Scott Mayer McKinney, Marcin Sieniek, Varun Godbole et al. · Nature · 2020 · 3.1K citations · Full text

, , +16

Comparison of the Performance of Screening Mammography, Physical Examination, and Breast US and Evaluation of Factors that Influence Them: An Analysis of 27,825 Patient Evaluations

T M Kolb, Jacob Lichy, Jeffrey H. Newhouse · Radiology · 2002 · 1.7K citations

, , +16

Comparison of Digital Mammography Alone and Digital Mammography Plus Tomosynthesis in a Population-based Screening Program

Per Skaane, Andriy I. Bandos, Randi Gullien et al. · Radiology · 2013 · 1K citations

, , +16

Breast Cancer Screening Using Tomosynthesis in Combination With Digital Mammography

Sarah M. Friedewald, Elizabeth A. Rafferty, Stephen L. Rose et al. · JAMA · 2014 · 838 citations

, , +16

Screening Mammography with Computer-aided Detection: Prospective Study of 12,860 Patients in a Community Breast Center

Timothy W. Freer, Michael J. Ulissey · Radiology · 2001 · 754 citations

, , +16

1–5 of 538

Authors

3.1K

  1. DL
    Diana L. Miglioretti

    University of California, San Francisco, United States

    30 publications · 3.5K citations

    26

    h-index

  2. KK
    Karla Kerlikowske

    University of California, San Francisco, United States

    28 publications · 3.8K citations

    26

    h-index

  3. SH
    Solveig Hofvind

    Cancer Registry of Norway, Norway

    27 publications · 3.1K citations

    25

    h-index

  4. BL
    Brian L. Sprague

    University of Vermont, United States

    21 publications · 2.2K citations

    20

    h-index

  5. HJ
    Harry J. de Koning

    Erasmus MC, Netherlands

    22 publications · 1.9K citations

    19

    h-index

1–5 of 3.1K

Institutions

1.1K

  1. University of California, San Francisco

    San Francisco, United States

    31 h-index

    82 publications

    7.9K citations

  2. University of Washington

    Seattle, United States

    30 h-index

    92 publications

    7.9K citations

  3. Cancer Registry of Norway

    Oslo, Norway

    25 h-index

    77 publications

    5.2K citations

  4. University of Vermont

    Burlington, United States

    24 h-index

    64 publications

    6K citations

  5. Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute

    Seattle, United States

    23 h-index

    58 publications

    5.4K citations

  6. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

    Chapel Hill, United States

    23 h-index

    37 publications

    2.5K citations

  7. Group Health Cooperative

    Seattle, United States

    22 h-index

    76 publications

    14.9K citations

  8. University of California, Davis

    Davis, United States

    20 h-index

    59 publications

    10.8K citations

1–8 of 1.1K

Venues

  1. Radiology

    74 publications · 10.7K citations

    44

    h-index

  2. Journal of Medical Screening

    33 publications · 1.4K citations

    21

    h-index

  3. JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute

    22 publications · 2.6K citations

    21

    h-index

  4. American Journal of Roentgenology

    AJR · 23 publications · 1.6K citations

    19

    h-index

  5. European Radiology

    18 publications · 1K citations

    17

    h-index

1–5