Rule Of Completeness

The Rule of Completeness is a legal principle within evidentiary jurisprudence that permits the admission of otherwise inadmissible evidence to ensure contextual fairness when a party introduces a statement or portion of evidence, thereby allowing the opposing party to present the remainder for full and accurate interpretation.

7

Publications

203

Citations

10

Authors

6

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

0

Variants

Doctrine Of Completeness

Authors

10

  1. MD
    Mark D. Flood

    University of Maryland, College Park, United States

    1 publications · 26 citations

    1

    h-index

  2. TW
    Terrence W. Deacon

    Harvard University, United States

    1 publications · 20 citations

    1

    h-index

  3. NB
    Nuel Belnap

    University of Pittsburgh, United States

    1 publications · 12 citations

    1

    h-index

  4. MP
    Maria Paola Bonacina

    University of Verona, Italy

    1 publications · 35 citations

    1

    h-index

  5. RN
    R. N. Boyd

    The Ohio State University, United States

    1 publications · 11 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5 of 10

Venues

  1. Theoretical Computer Science

    1 publications · 35 citations

    1

    h-index

  2. Theology and Science

    1 publications · 20 citations

    1

    h-index

  3. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic

    1 publications · 12 citations

    1

    h-index

  4. New England Journal of Medicine

    NEJM · 1 publications · 89 citations

    1

    h-index

  5. Dialogue

    1 publications · 10 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5