Rule Indeterminacy

Rule Indeterminacy is a theoretical construct in legal and normative systems theory denoting the inherent uncertainty in the application or interpretation of primary or secondary rules due to ambiguities in their formulation, scope, or boundaries, distinguishing it from rule ambiguity or vagueness by focusing specifically on the indeterminable outcomes arising from rule implementation rather than linguistic or conceptual imprecision alone.

12

Publications

301

Citations

14

Authors

10

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

0

Authors

14

  1. GK
    Gillian K. Hadfield

    University of Toronto, Canada

    2 publications · 58 citations

    2

    h-index

  2. DM
    Dolores Miller

    University of Missouri–Kansas City, United States

    1 publications · 23 citations

    1

    h-index

  3. RB
    Rosa Brooks

    Georgetown University, United States

    1 publications · 16 citations

    1

    h-index

  4. CD
    Christopher David Ruiz Cameron

    University of California, Berkeley, United States

    1 publications · 14 citations

    1

    h-index

  5. FS
    F. Schauer

    Tomas Bata University in Zlín, Czechia

    1 publications · 38 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5 of 14

Venues

  1. Social Forces

    SF · 2 publications · 40 citations

    2

    h-index

  2. California Law Review

    2 publications · 58 citations

    2

    h-index

  3. Current Legal Problems

    CLP · 1 publications · 38 citations

    1

    h-index

  4. Political Theory

    PT · 1 publications · 10 citations

    1

    h-index

  5. Philosophical Studies

    1 publications · 23 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5