Rule Indeterminacy
Rule Indeterminacy is a theoretical construct in legal and normative systems theory denoting the inherent uncertainty in the application or interpretation of primary or secondary rules due to ambiguities in their formulation, scope, or boundaries, distinguishing it from rule ambiguity or vagueness by focusing specifically on the indeterminable outcomes arising from rule implementation rather than linguistic or conceptual imprecision alone.
12
Publications
301
Citations
14
Authors
10
Institutions
Publications per year
2017–2026
0
Parents
12
On The Supposed Defeasibility of Legal Rules
F. Schauer · Current Legal Problems · 1998 · 38 citations
Julien Meyer, Paul E. Hammond · Social Forces · 1971 · 25 citations
1–5 of 12
14
2
h-index
1
h-index
1
h-index
University of California, Berkeley, United States
1 publications · 14 citations
1
h-index
1
h-index
1–5 of 14
10
University of Arizona
Tucson, United States
2 h-index
2 publications
40 citations
Stanford University
Stanford, United States
2 h-index
2 publications
40 citations
University of California, Berkeley
Berkeley, United States
2 h-index
2 publications
35 citations
Georgetown University
Washington, United States
1 h-index
1 publications
16 citations
Harvard University
Cambridge, United States
1 h-index
1 publications
38 citations
John F. Kennedy University
Pleasant Hill, United States
1 h-index
1 publications
38 citations
University of Missouri–Kansas City
Kansas City, United States
1 h-index
1 publications
23 citations
National University
La Jolla, United States
1 h-index
1 publications
20 citations
1–8 of 10
SF · 2 publications · 40 citations
2
h-index
2 publications · 58 citations
2
h-index
CLP · 1 publications · 38 citations
1
h-index
PT · 1 publications · 10 citations
1
h-index
1 publications · 23 citations
1
h-index
1–5