Research Misconduct Adjudication
Research Misconduct Adjudication is a formal institutional process within research ethics governance that involves the systematic evaluation, investigation, and determination of findings regarding alleged violations of research integrity, distinguishing it from general ethical review by its focus on substantiating and addressing specific instances of fabricated, falsified, or plagiarized research conduct.
243
Publications
8.5K
Citations
445
Authors
286
Institutions
Publications per year
2017–2026
62
Parents
243
1–5 of 243
445
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, United States
12 publications · 835 citations
11
h-index
7
h-index
6
h-index
5
h-index
4
h-index
1–5 of 445
286
National Institutes of Health
Bethesda, United States
9 h-index
15 publications
1.1K citations
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
Durham, United States
9 h-index
14 publications
1.1K citations

Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Amsterdam, The Netherlands
5 h-index
12 publications
538 citations
University of Sussex
Brighton, United Kingdom
4 h-index
4 publications
233 citations
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, United States
4 h-index
7 publications
246 citations
Wayne State University
Detroit, United States
4 h-index
5 publications
220 citations

University of Manchester
Manchester, United Kingdom
4 h-index
4 publications
139 citations
National University of Singapore
Singapore, Singapore
4 h-index
6 publications
215 citations
1–8 of 286
30 publications · 1.2K citations
18
h-index
20 publications · 609 citations
15
h-index
Repository · 19 publications · 439 citations
12
h-index
13 publications · 622 citations
11
h-index
9 publications · 124 citations
9
h-index
1–5