Research Misconduct Adjudication

Research Misconduct Adjudication is a formal institutional process within research ethics governance that involves the systematic evaluation, investigation, and determination of findings regarding alleged violations of research integrity, distinguishing it from general ethical review by its focus on substantiating and addressing specific instances of fabricated, falsified, or plagiarized research conduct.

243

Publications

8.5K

Citations

445

Authors

286

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

62

Authors

445

  1. DB
    David B. Resnik

    National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, United States

    12 publications · 835 citations

    11

    h-index

  2. EW
    Elizabeth Wager

    University of Split, Croatia

    7 publications · 202 citations

    7

    h-index

  3. LB
    L.M. Bouter

    Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Netherlands

    6 publications · 383 citations

    6

    h-index

  4. SK
    Sabine Kleinert

    Lancet Laboratories, South Africa

    5 publications · 139 citations

    5

    h-index

  5. MC
    Marcel Chotkowski LaFollette

    Film Independent, United States

    4 publications · 107 citations

    4

    h-index

1–5 of 445

Venues

  1. Accountability in Research

    30 publications · 1.2K citations

    18

    h-index

  2. Science and Engineering Ethics

    20 publications · 609 citations

    15

    h-index

  3. PubMed

    Repository · 19 publications · 439 citations

    12

    h-index

  4. BMJ

    13 publications · 622 citations

    11

    h-index

  5. Science

    9 publications · 124 citations

    9

    h-index

1–5