Repugnant Conclusion
The "Repugnant Conclusion" is a theoretical consequence in population ethics whereby, within certain aggregative moral frameworks, a very large population with barely positive welfare is considered morally preferable to a smaller population with significantly higher welfare, thereby challenging intuitive judgments about the value of well-being and population size.
35
Publications
1.6K
Citations
63
Authors
51
Institutions
Publications per year
2017–2026
9
Parents
35
What Should We Do About Future Generations?
Yew‐Kwang Ng · Economics and Philosophy · 1989 · 234 citations
Environmental Ethics · 2006 · 212 citations
Why We Ought to Accept the Repugnant Conclusion
Torbjörn Tännsjö · Utilitas · 2002 · 164 citations
Michael Huemer · Mind · 2008 · 114 citations
Can We Avoid the Repugnant Conclusion?
Derek Parfit · Theoria · 2016 · 106 citations
1–5 of 35
63
3
h-index
3
h-index
2
h-index
2
h-index
2
h-index
1–5 of 63
51

Stockholm University
Stockholm, Sweden
6 h-index
7 publications
429 citations
University of Copenhagen
Copenhagen, Denmark
4 h-index
4 publications
158 citations
Institute for Futures Studies
Stockholm, Sweden
4 h-index
7 publications
341 citations

Australian National University
Canberra, Australia
3 h-index
6 publications
244 citations

University of British Columbia
Vancouver, Canada
3 h-index
4 publications
104 citations
University of Oxford
Oxford, United Kingdom
3 h-index
8 publications
650 citations

University of Gothenburg
Gothenburg, Sweden
2 h-index
2 publications
131 citations
The University of Texas at Austin
Austin, United States
2 h-index
2 publications
94 citations
1–8 of 51
7 publications · 401 citations
7
h-index
5 publications · 141 citations
5
h-index
4 publications · 323 citations
4
h-index
3 publications · 189 citations
3
h-index
2 publications · 143 citations
2
h-index
1–5