Relative Judgment
Relative Judgment is a cognitive decision-making process in eyewitness testimony research whereby an individual identifies a suspect by comparing lineup members against one another rather than evaluating each member independently against an absolute memory standard.
80
Publications
5.5K
Citations
161
Authors
90
Institutions
Publications per year
2017–2026
5
Parents
80
Absolute Identification by Relative Judgment.
Neil Stewart, Gordon D. A. Brown, Nick Chater · Psychological Review · 2005 · 350 citations
1–5 of 80
161
3
h-index
3
h-index
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Amiens-Picardie, France
2 publications · 88 citations
2
h-index
2
h-index
2
h-index
1–5 of 161
90
Queen's University
Kingston, Canada
4 h-index
6 publications
368 citations
University of California, Riverside
Riverside, United States
3 h-index
8 publications
408 citations
University College London
London, United Kingdom
3 h-index
6 publications
281 citations

Flinders University
Adelaide, Australia
2 h-index
4 publications
426 citations
University of Oregon
Eugene, United States
2 h-index
2 publications
63 citations
University of Oklahoma
Norman, United States
2 h-index
5 publications
76 citations
Georgia Institute of Technology
Atlanta, United States
2 h-index
10 publications
666 citations
Université de Lille
Lille, France
2 h-index
2 publications
44 citations
1–8 of 90
5 publications · 375 citations
5
h-index
4 publications · 1K citations
4
h-index
4 publications · 365 citations
4
h-index
ACP · 3 publications · 124 citations
3
h-index
3 publications · 41 citations
3
h-index
1–5