Relative Judgment

Relative Judgment is a cognitive decision-making process in eyewitness testimony research whereby an individual identifies a suspect by comparing lineup members against one another rather than evaluating each member independently against an absolute memory standard.

80

Publications

5.5K

Citations

161

Authors

90

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

5

Authors

161

  1. SE
    Steven E. Clark

    University of California, Riverside, United States

    3 publications · 159 citations

    3

    h-index

  2. NB
    Neil Brewer

    Flinders University, Australia

    3 publications · 244 citations

    3

    h-index

  3. OG
    Olivier Godefroy

    Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Amiens-Picardie, France

    2 publications · 88 citations

    2

    h-index

  4. TL
    Terry L. Maple

    Georgia Institute of Technology, United States

    2 publications · 126 citations

    2

    h-index

  5. BA
    Barbara Anne Dosher

    University of California, Irvine, United States

    2 publications · 170 citations

    2

    h-index

1–5 of 161

Venues

  1. Journal of Applied Psychology

    5 publications · 375 citations

    5

    h-index

  2. Law and Human Behavior

    4 publications · 1K citations

    4

    h-index

  3. Perception & Psychophysics

    4 publications · 365 citations

    4

    h-index

  4. Applied Cognitive Psychology

    ACP · 3 publications · 124 citations

    3

    h-index

  5. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

    3 publications · 41 citations

    3

    h-index

1–5