Reciprocal Justification

Reciprocal Justification is a normative principle in political philosophy that belongs to the broader category of public reason, distinguishing itself by requiring that citizens offer one another mutually acceptable justifications for coercive laws, grounded in reasons each can reasonably accept given their shared status as free and equal.

4

Publications

304

Citations

3

Authors

2

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

0

Authors

3

  1. RA
    Ron Avi Astor

    University of Southern California, United States

    2 publications · 224 citations

    2

    h-index

  2. SG
    Stefan Gosepath

    Berlin University of the Arts, Germany

    1 publications · 23 citations

    1

    h-index

  3. CB
    Colin Bird

    University of Virginia, United States

    1 publications · 57 citations

    1

    h-index

  4. JB
    James Blachowicz

    Loyola University Chicago, United States

    1 publications · 12 citations

    0

    h-index

1–4 of 3

Institutions

2

Venues

  1. Child Development

    2 publications · 224 citations

    2

    h-index

  2. Ratio Juris

    1 publications · 23 citations

    1

    h-index

  3. Ethics

    1 publications · 57 citations

    1

    h-index

  4. Synthese

    1 publications · 12 citations

1–4