Reasonableness Review
Reasonableness Review is a standard of judicial review of administrative action whereby a court, exercising a deferential posture, examines whether the challenged decision—having regard to the governing legal and factual constraints and the reasons provided—falls within a range of acceptable and defensible outcomes rather than determining its correctness anew.
13
Publications
262
Citations
18
Authors
9
Institutions
Publications per year
2017–2026
2
13
NICE vindicated in UK's High Court
Richard Horton · The Lancet · 2007 · 35 citations
Law, Public Law, Jurisdiction +2
The supreme court and reasonableness
Josina M. Makau · Quarterly Journal of Speech · 1984 · 34 citations
Law, Constitutional Law, Public Law +13
J. J. C. Smart · Philosophy · 1950 · 24 citations
W. J. Waluchow · Philosophy Compass · 2007 · 23 citations
Law, Constitutional Law, Public Law +11
1–5 of 13
18
1
h-index
1
h-index
1
h-index
1
h-index
1
h-index
1–5 of 18
9
State Enterprise "National Institute for Development Infrastructure"
Kyiv, Ukraine
1 h-index
1 publications
16 citations

McMaster University
Hamilton, Canada
1 h-index
1 publications
23 citations
George Mason University
Fairfax, United States
1 h-index
1 publications
15 citations
Lancet Laboratories
Johannesburg, South Africa
1 h-index
1 publications
35 citations

Stellenbosch University
Stellenbosch, South Africa
1 h-index
2 publications
26 citations
KU Leuven
Leuven, Belgium
1 h-index
1 publications
10 citations
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, United States
1 h-index
3 publications
45 citations

Vanderbilt University
Nashville, United States
1 h-index
2 publications
26 citations
1–8 of 9
Repository · 1 publications · 10 citations
1
h-index
1 publications · 23 citations
1
h-index
1 publications · 15 citations
1
h-index
Repository · 1 publications · 13 citations
1
h-index
Repository · 1 publications · 11 citations
1
h-index
1–5