Reasonableness Review

Reasonableness Review is a standard of judicial review of administrative action whereby a court, exercising a deferential posture, examines whether the challenged decision—having regard to the governing legal and factual constraints and the reasons provided—falls within a range of acceptable and defensible outcomes rather than determining its correctness anew.

13

Publications

262

Citations

18

Authors

9

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

2

Authors

18

  1. WK
    W. Kip Viscusi

    Vanderbilt University, United States

    1 publications · 13 citations

    1

    h-index

  2. CC
    Caroline Cecof

    Vanderbilt University, United States

    1 publications · 13 citations

    1

    h-index

  3. RH
    Richard Horton

    Lancet Laboratories, South Africa

    1 publications · 35 citations

    1

    h-index

  4. GQ
    Geo Quinot

    Stellenbosch University, South Africa

    1 publications · 13 citations

    1

    h-index

  5. JM
    Josina M. Makau

    The Ohio State University, United States

    1 publications · 34 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5 of 18

Venues

  1. SSRN Electronic Journal

    Repository · 1 publications · 10 citations

    1

    h-index

  2. Philosophy Compass

    1 publications · 23 citations

    1

    h-index

  3. Drugs & Aging

    1 publications · 15 citations

    1

    h-index

  4. SUNScholar (Stellenbosch University)

    Repository · 1 publications · 13 citations

    1

    h-index

  5. Open University of Cape Town (University of Cape Town)

    Repository · 1 publications · 11 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5